The Association between Histamine 2 Receptor Antagonist Use and Clostridium difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a major health problem. Epidemiological evidence suggests that there is an association between acid suppression therapy and development of CDI. We sought to systematically review the literature that examined the association between histamine 2 receptor antago...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 8; no. 3; p. e56498
Main Authors Tleyjeh, Imad M., Abdulhak, Aref A. Bin, Riaz, Muhammad, Garbati, Musa A., Al-Tannir, Mohamad, Alasmari, Faisal A., AlGhamdi, Mushabab, Khan, Abdur Rahman, Erwin, Patricia J., Sutton, Alex J., Baddour, Larry M.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 04.03.2013
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a major health problem. Epidemiological evidence suggests that there is an association between acid suppression therapy and development of CDI. We sought to systematically review the literature that examined the association between histamine 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) and CDI. We searched Medline, Current Contents, Embase, ISI Web of Science and Elsevier Scopus from 1990 to 2012 for all analytical studies that examined the association between H2RAs and CDI. Two authors independently reviewed the studies for eligibility. Data about studies characteristics, adjusted effect estimates and quality were extracted. Thirty-five observations from 33 eligible studies that included 201834 participants were analyzed. Studies were performed in 6 countries and nine of them were multicenter. Most studies did not specify the type or duration of H2RAs therapy. The pooled effect estimate was 1.44, 95% CI (1.22-1.7), I(2) = 70.5%. This association was consistent across different subgroups (by study design and country) and there was no evidence of publication bias. The pooled effect estimate for high quality studies was 1.39 (1.15-1.68), I2 = 72.3%. Meta-regression analysis of 10 study-level variables did not identify sources of heterogeneity. In a speculative analysis, the number needed to harm (NNH) with H2RAs at 14 days after hospital admission in patients receiving antibiotics or not was 58, 95% CI (37, 115) and 425, 95% CI (267, 848), respectively. For the general population, the NNH at 1 year was 4549, 95% CI (2860, 9097). In this rigorous systematic review and meta-analysis, we observed an association between H2RAs and CDI. The absolute risk of CDI associated with H2RAs is highest in hospitalized patients receiving antibiotics.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Feature-3
ObjectType-Evidence Based Healthcare-1
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-4
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Conceived and designed the experiments: IMT ABA AS MR LMB. Analyzed the data: IMT AS MR ABA. Wrote the paper: IMT ABA AS MR FAA MAA MAT MAG ARK PJE LMB.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0056498