Denoising MR images using non-local means filter with combined patch and pixel similarity

Denoising is critical for improving visual quality and reliability of associative quantitative analysis when magnetic resonance (MR) images are acquired with low signal-to-noise ratios. The classical non-local means (NLM) filter, which averages pixels weighted by the similarity of their neighborhood...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 9; no. 6; p. e100240
Main Authors Zhang, Xinyuan, Hou, Guirong, Ma, Jianhua, Yang, Wei, Lin, Bingquan, Xu, Yikai, Chen, Wufan, Feng, Yanqiu
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 16.06.2014
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Denoising is critical for improving visual quality and reliability of associative quantitative analysis when magnetic resonance (MR) images are acquired with low signal-to-noise ratios. The classical non-local means (NLM) filter, which averages pixels weighted by the similarity of their neighborhoods, is adapted and demonstrated to effectively reduce Rician noise without affecting edge details in MR magnitude images. However, the Rician NLM (RNLM) filter usually blurs small high-contrast particle details which might be clinically relevant information. In this paper, we investigated the reason of this particle blurring problem and proposed a novel particle-preserving RNLM filter with combined patch and pixel (RNLM-CPP) similarity. The results of experiments on both synthetic and real MR data demonstrate that the proposed RNLM-CPP filter can preserve small high-contrast particle details better than the original RNLM filter while denoising MR images.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Conceived and designed the experiments: YF. Performed the experiments: XZ. Analyzed the data: XZ YF GH BL YX. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: GH BL YX. Wrote the paper: XZ. Revised the manuscript: JM WY WC.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0100240