Three-Armed Trials Including Placebo and No-Treatment Groups May Be Subject to Publication Bias: Systematic Review

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 6; no. 5; p. e20679
• Main Authors: Koog, Yun Hyung, We, Seo Ryang, Min, Byung-Il
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 31.05.2011; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Acupuncture; Analysis; Bias; Chronic fatigue syndrome; Clinical trials; Data processing; Design factors; Electrical stimuli; Heterogeneity; Humans; Mathematical analysis; Mathematics; Medical ethics; Medicine; Meta-analysis; Patients; Placebo effect; Placebos; Publication Bias; Randomization; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Science Policy; Simulation; Stimulation; Studies; Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation-TENS; South Korea
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020679

It has been argued that placebos may not have important clinical impacts in general. However, there is increasing evidence of a publication bias among trials published in journals. Therefore, we explored the potential for publication bias in randomized trials with active treatment, placebo, and no-treatment groups. Three-armed randomized trials of acupuncture, acupoint stimulation, and transcutaneous electrical stimulation were obtained from electronic databases. Effect sizes between treatment and placebo groups were calculated for treatment effect, and effect sizes between placebo and no-treatment groups were calculated for placebo effect. All data were then analyzed for publication bias. For the treatment effect, small trials with fewer than 100 patients per arm showed more benefits than large trials with at least 100 patients per arm in acupuncture and acupoint stimulation. For the placebo effect, no differences were found between large and small trials. Further analyses showed that the treatment effect in acupuncture and acupoint stimulation may be subject to publication bias because study design and any known factors of heterogeneity were not associated with the small study effects. In the simulation, the magnitude of the placebo effect was smaller than that calculated after considering publication bias. Randomized three-armed trials, which are necessary for estimating the placebo effect, may be subject to publication bias. If the magnitude of the placebo effect is assessed in an intervention, the potential for publication bias should be investigated using data related to the treatment effect.