Cerebral Asymmetries: Complementary and Independent Processes

Most people are right-handed and left-cerebrally dominant for speech, leading historically to the general notion of left-hemispheric dominance, and more recently to genetic models proposing a single lateralizing gene. This hypothetical gene can account for higher incidence of right-handers in those...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 5; no. 3; p. e9682
Main Authors Badzakova-Trajkov, Gjurgjica, Häberling, Isabelle S., Roberts, Reece P., Corballis, Michael C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Public Library of Science 12.03.2010
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Most people are right-handed and left-cerebrally dominant for speech, leading historically to the general notion of left-hemispheric dominance, and more recently to genetic models proposing a single lateralizing gene. This hypothetical gene can account for higher incidence of right-handers in those with left cerebral dominance for speech. It remains unclear how this dominance relates to the right-cerebral dominance for some nonverbal functions such as spatial or emotional processing. Here we use functional magnetic resonance imaging with a sample of 155 subjects to measure asymmetrical activation induced by speech production in the frontal lobes, by face processing in the temporal lobes, and by spatial processing in the parietal lobes. Left-frontal, right-temporal, and right-parietal dominance were all intercorrelated, suggesting that right-cerebral biases may be at least in part complementary to the left-hemispheric dominance for language. However, handedness and parietal asymmetry for spatial processing were uncorrelated, implying independent lateralizing processes, one producing a leftward bias most closely associated with handedness, and the other a rightward bias most closely associated with spatial attention.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
Conceived and designed the experiments: GBT ISH RPR MC. Performed the experiments: GBT ISH. Analyzed the data: GBT ISH MC. Wrote the paper: GBT MC.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0009682