An integrative phylogenomic approach to elucidate the evolutionary history and divergence times of Neuropterida (Insecta: Holometabola)

• Published in: BMC ecology and evolution Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 64 - 24
• Main Authors: Vasilikopoulos, Alexandros, Misof, Bernhard, Meusemann, Karen, Lieberz, Doria, Flouri, Tomáš, Beutel, Rolf G., Niehuis, Oliver, Wappler, Torsten, Rust, Jes, Peters, Ralph S., Donath, Alexander, Podsiadlowski, Lars, Mayer, Christoph, Bartel, Daniela, Böhm, Alexander, Liu, Shanlin, Kapli, Paschalia, Greve, Carola, Jepson, James E., Liu, Xingyue, Zhou, Xin, Aspöck, Horst, Aspöck, Ulrike
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 03.06.2020; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Analysis; Animals; Base Sequence; Comparative analysis; Coniopterygidae; Data analysis; Datasets; Divergence; DNA sequencing; Endopterygota; Evolution, Molecular; Genetic research; Genomes; Genomics; Hemerobiidae; Holometabola - genetics; Hypotheses; Insects; Ithonidae; Jurassic; Jurassic period; Larva - genetics; Larvae; Megaloptera; Morphology; Myrmeleontiformia; Neuroptera; Neuropterida; Permutations; Phylogenetics; Phylogeny; Placement; Raphidioptera; RNA-seq; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Terrestrial ecosystems; Terrestrial environments; Transcriptome; Transcriptomics; Megaloptera; Raphidioptera; Four-cluster likelihood mapping; RNA-seq; Multi-species coalescent; Transcriptomics; Supermatrices; Endopterygota; Neuroptera
• ISSN: 1471-2148; 1471-2148; 2730-7182
• DOI: 10.1186/s12862-020-01631-6

The latest advancements in DNA sequencing technologies have facilitated the resolution of the phylogeny of insects, yet parts of the tree of Holometabola remain unresolved. The phylogeny of Neuropterida has been extensively studied, but no strong consensus exists concerning the phylogenetic relationships within the order Neuroptera. Here, we assembled a novel transcriptomic dataset to address previously unresolved issues in the phylogeny of Neuropterida and to infer divergence times within the group. We tested the robustness of our phylogenetic estimates by comparing summary coalescent and concatenation-based phylogenetic approaches and by employing different quartet-based measures of phylogenomic incongruence, combined with data permutations. Our results suggest that the order Raphidioptera is sister to Neuroptera + Megaloptera. Coniopterygidae is inferred as sister to all remaining neuropteran families suggesting that larval cryptonephry could be a ground plan feature of Neuroptera. A clade that includes Nevrorthidae, Osmylidae, and Sisyridae (i.e. Osmyloidea) is inferred as sister to all other Neuroptera except Coniopterygidae, and Dilaridae is placed as sister to all remaining neuropteran families. Ithonidae is inferred as the sister group of monophyletic Myrmeleontiformia. The phylogenetic affinities of Chrysopidae and Hemerobiidae were dependent on the data type analyzed, and quartet-based analyses showed only weak support for the placement of Hemerobiidae as sister to Ithonidae + Myrmeleontiformia. Our molecular dating analyses suggest that most families of Neuropterida started to diversify in the Jurassic and our ancestral character state reconstructions suggest a primarily terrestrial environment of the larvae of Neuropterida and Neuroptera. Our extensive phylogenomic analyses consolidate several key aspects in the backbone phylogeny of Neuropterida, such as the basal placement of Coniopterygidae within Neuroptera and the monophyly of Osmyloidea. Furthermore, they provide new insights into the timing of diversification of Neuropterida. Despite the vast amount of analyzed molecular data, we found that certain nodes in the tree of Neuroptera are not robustly resolved. Therefore, we emphasize the importance of integrating the results of morphological analyses with those of sequence-based phylogenomics. We also suggest that comparative analyses of genomic meta-characters should be incorporated into future phylogenomic studies of Neuropterida.