No Detectable Fertility Benefit from a Single Additional Mating in Wild Stalk-Eyed Flies

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 5; no. 12; p. e14309
• Main Authors: Harley, Elisabeth, Fowler, Kevin, Cotton, Samuel
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: United States Public Library of Science 13.12.2010; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Animals; Chromosomes; Competition; Cotton; Diopsidae; Diptera - genetics; Ecology; Ecology/Behavioral Ecology; Ecology/Evolutionary Ecology; Eggs; Evolution; Evolutionary biology; Evolutionary Biology/Animal Behavior; Evolutionary Biology/Evolutionary Ecology; Evolutionary Biology/Sexual Behavior; Female; Females; Fertility; Fitness; Genetics; Gryllus bimaculatus; Insects; Laboratories; Male; Meiosis; Meiotic drive; Offspring; Population; Reproduction; Reproductive fitness; Selection, Genetic; Sex Factors; Sexual Behavior, Animal - physiology; Sperm
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014309

Multiple mating by female insects is widespread, and the explanation(s) for repeated mating by females has been the subject of much discussion. Females may profit from mating multiply through direct material benefits that increase their own reproductive output, or indirect genetic benefits that increase offspring fitness. One particular direct benefit that has attracted significant attention is that of fertility assurance, as females often need to mate multiply to achieve high fertility. This hypothesis has never been tested in a wild insect population. Female Malaysian stalk-eyed flies (Teleopsis dalmanni) mate repeatedly during their lifetime, and have been shown to be sperm limited under both laboratory and field conditions. Here we ask whether receiving an additional mating alleviates sperm limitation in wild females. In our experiment one group of females received a single additional mating, while a control group received an interrupted, and therefore unsuccessful, mating. Females that received an additional mating did not lay more fertilised eggs in total, nor did they lay proportionately more fertilised eggs. Female fertility declined significantly through time, demonstrating that females were sperm limited. However, receipt of an additional mating did not significantly alter the rate of this decline. Our data suggest that the fertility consequences of a single additional mating were small. We discuss this effect (or lack thereof), and suggest that it is likely to be attributed to small ejaculate size, a high proportion of failed copulations, and the presence of X-linked meiotic drive in this species.