Mechanical properties of nerve roots and rami radiculares isolated from fresh pig spinal cords
No reports have described experiments designed to determine the strength characteristics of spinal nerve roots and rami radiculares for the purpose of explaining the complexity of symptoms of medullary cone lesions and cauda equina syndrome. In this study, to explain the pathogenesis of cauda equina...
Saved in:
Published in | Neural regeneration research Vol. 10; no. 11; pp. 1869 - 1873 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
India
Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd
01.11.2015
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan%Faculty of Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan%Non-Profit Organization Corporation, Japan Orthopedic Biomechanics Institute, Yamaguchi, Japan%Faculties of Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | No reports have described experiments designed to determine the strength characteristics of spinal nerve roots and rami radiculares for the purpose of explaining the complexity of symptoms of medullary cone lesions and cauda equina syndrome. In this study, to explain the pathogenesis of cauda equina syndrome, monoaxial tensile tests were performed to determine the strength characteristics of spinal nerve roots and rami radiculares, and analysis was conducted to evaluate the stress-strain relationship and strength characteristics. Using the same tensile test device, the nerve root and ramus radiculares isolated from the spinal cords of pigs were subjected to the tensile test and stress relaxation test at load strain rates of 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 s-1 under identical settings. The tensile strength of the nerve root was not rate dependent, while the ramus radiculares tensile strength tended to decrease as the strain rate increased. These findings provide important insights into cauda equina symptoms, radiculopathy, and clinical symptoms of the medullary cone. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | nerve regeneration; cauda equina syndrome; monoaxial tensile tests; radiculopathy;strength characteristics; stress-strain relationship; lumbar spinal canal stenosis; paralysis; spinal cord;neural degeneration No reports have described experiments designed to determine the strength characteristics of spinal nerve roots and rami radiculares for the purpose of explaining the complexity of symptoms of medullary cone lesions and cauda equina syndrome. In this study, to explain the pathogenesis of cauda equina syndrome, monoaxial tensile tests were performed to determine the strength characteristics of spinal nerve roots and rami radiculares, and analysis was conducted to evaluate the stress-strain relationship and strength characteristics. Using the same tensile test device, the nerve root and ramus radiculares isolated from the spinal cords of pigs were subjected to the tensile test and stress relaxation test at load strain rates of 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 s-1 under identical settings. The tensile strength of the nerve root was not rate dependent, while the ramus radiculares tensile strength tended to decrease as the strain rate increased. These findings provide important insights into cauda equina symptoms, radiculopathy, and clinical symptoms of the medullary cone. Norihiro Nishida, Tsukasa Kanchiku, Junji Ohgi, Kazuhiko Ichihara, Xian Chen, Toshihiko Taguchi( 1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan 2 Faculty of Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan 3 Non-Profit Organization Corporation, Japan Orthopedic Biomechanics Institute, Yamaguchi, Japan 4 Faculties of Engineering, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan 5 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Yamaguchi University Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi, Japan) 11-5422/R ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Author contributions: NN and JO wrote the paper. JO and KI performed experiments. TK, XC, and TT guided the research. All authors approved the final version of this paper. |
ISSN: | 1673-5374 1876-7958 |
DOI: | 10.4103/1673-5374.170319 |