Periprosthetic femoral fractures after hemiarthroplasty. An analysis of 17 cases

To describe the characteristics of patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures after hemiarthroplasty and analyze their treatment. An observational, longitudinal, retrospective study was conducted on a series of 17 patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip hemiarthroplasty. Fourtee...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRevista española de cirugía ortopédica y traumatología Vol. 59; no. 5; pp. 333 - 342
Main Authors Suárez-Huerta, M, Roces-Fernández, A, Mencía-Barrio, R, Alonso-Barrio, J A, Ramos-Pascua, L R
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Spain 01.09.2015
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To describe the characteristics of patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures after hemiarthroplasty and analyze their treatment. An observational, longitudinal, retrospective study was conducted on a series of 17 patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures after hip hemiarthroplasty. Fourteen fractures were treated surgically. The characteristics of patients, fractures and treatment outcomes in terms of complications, mortality and functionality were analyzed. The large majority (82%) of patients were women, the mean age was 86 years and with an ASA index of 3 or 4 in 15 patients. Ten fractures were type B. There were 8 general complications, one deep infection, one mobilization of a non-exchanged hemiarthroplasty, and 2 non-unions. There were 85% consolidated fractures, and only 5 patients recovered the same function prior to the injury. At the time of the study 9 patients had died (53%). Periprosthetic femoral fractures after hemiarthroplasty will increase in the coming years and their treatment is difficult. Periprosthetic femoral fractures after hemiarthroplasty are more common in women around 90 years-old, and usually occur in patients with significant morbidity. Although the Vancouver classification is reliable, simple and reproducible, it is only a guide to decide on the best treatment in a patient often fragile. The preoperative planning is essential when deciding a surgical treatment.
ISSN:1988-8856
1988-8856
DOI:10.1016/j.recote.2015.07.004