Comparative evaluation of intrathecal morphine and intrathecal dexmedetomidine in patients undergoing gynaecological surgeries under spinal anaesthesia: A prospective randomised double blind study

• Published in: Indian journal of anaesthesia Vol. 60; no. 6; pp. 382 - 387
• Main Authors: Kurhekar, Pranjali, kumar, S, Sampath, D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: India Wolters Kluwer - Medknow Publications 01.06.2016; Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd; Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd; Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd; Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
• Subjects: Analgesics; Anesthesia; Blood pressure; Comparative analysis; Dexmedetomidine; Dosage and administration; Drug dosages; gynaecological surgeries; Gynecology; Morphine; Narcotics; Original; Pain; post-operative analgesia; Pruritus; spinal anaesthesia; Studies; Surgery; Vomiting; India; post-operative analgesia; spinal anaesthesia; gynaecological surgeries; Dexmedetomidine; morphine
• ISSN: 0019-5049; 0976-2817
• DOI: 10.4103/0019-5049.183387

Background and Aims: Inrathecal opioids like morphine added to local anaesthetic agents have been found to be effective in achieving prolonged post-operative analgesia. Intrathecal dexmedetomidine may be devoid of undesirable side effects related to morphine and hence, this study was designed to evaluate analgesic efficacy, haemodynamic stability and adverse effects of both these adjuvants in patients undergoing gynaecological surgeries. Methods: This was a prospective, randomised, double blind study involving 25 patients in each group. Group M received 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 250 μg of morphine while Group D received 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 2.5 μg of dexmedetomidine. Characteristics of spinal block, time for first rescue analgesic and total dose of rescue analgesics were noted. Vital parameters and adverse effects were noted perioperatively. Data analysis was done with independent two sample t-test and Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Time for first rescue analgesic (P = 0.056) and total analgesic demand were similar in both groups. Duration of sensory (P = 0.001) and motor (P = 000) block was significantly higher in dexmedetomidine group. Itching was noticed in 36% and nausea in 52% of patients in the morphine group, either of which was not seen in dexmedetomidine group. Conclusion: Intrathecal dexmedetomidine produces prolonged motor and sensory blockade without undesirable side effects but intraoperative hypotension was more frequent in dexmedetomidine group.