Government intervention and market integration in Indonesian rice markets

• Published in: Agricultural economics Vol. 19; no. 3; pp. 283 - 295
• Main Authors: Ismet, Mohammad, Barkley, Andrew P, Llewelyn, Richard V
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Elsevier B.V 01.12.1998; Blackwell
• Series: Agricultural Economics
• Subjects: ARROZ; Cointegration; GOBIERNO; GOUVERNEMENT; GOVERNMENT; Government rice price policy; INDONESIA; Indonesian rice prices; INDONESIE; INTEGRACION; INTEGRATION; INTERVENCION ESTATAL; INTERVENTION DE L'ETAT; MARCHE; MARKETS; MERCADOS; POLITICA DE PRECIOS; POLITIQUE DES PRIX; PRECIOS; PRICE POLICIES; PRICES; PRIX; RICE; RIZ; STATE INTERVENTION; Government rice price policy; Indonesian rice prices; Cointegration
• ISSN: 0169-5150; 1574-0862
• DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5150(98)00056-5

Long-run spatial price relationships in Indonesian rice markets and factors affecting the degree of market integration are evaluated using multivariate cointegration tests with weekly price data for the 1982–1993 period. The analysis includes evaluation of pre-self-sufficiency and post-self-sufficiency periods as well as for the entire period. The cointegration tests for entire Indonesian rice market, represented by the nine most relevant price series, indicate that relative to the pre-self-sufficiency period, the post-self-sufficiency period has a smaller degree of market integration. The change of the degree of market integration over time indicates that rationalizing of the Indonesian rice price policy beyond 1984 rice self-sufficiency has resulted in a less integrated market. This suggests that the policy shift has allowed the government to decrease its intervention without significantly decreasing market integration, indicating that the private sector is responding to price signals appropriately. It is possible that further reduction in intervention through widening the band between the floor and ceiling price could be accomplished without greatly affecting market integration. Regression results show that government intervention in terms of rice procurement significantly influenced market integration during the period of post-self-sufficiency (1985–1993) and the entire period of 1982–1993. This indicates that this aspect of government intervention has had positive influences on market integration, in contrast to distribution efforts, which were not found to be statistically significant. Procurement prices may be high, and could perhaps be lowered, reducing program costs. Regional per capita income is also found to be positively related to higher levels of market integration, suggesting that in periods of economic growth, government intervention may be decreased, thereby reducing program costs.