A Comparison of the Oligosaccharide Structures of Antithrombin Derived from Plasma and Recombinant Using POTELLIGENT® Technology

Human antithrombin (AT) has two isoforms of which the predominant α-form is glycosylated on all four possible glycosylation sites and the lower abundant β-isoform lacks the oligosaccharide on Asn135. The main oligosaccharide structure of human AT consists of biantennary complex-type oligosaccharides...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAnalytical Sciences Vol. 35; no. 12; pp. 1333 - 1340
Main Authors YAGI, Yuki, OKAZAKI, Akira, ENDO, Megumi, YANAGISAWA, Kumi, FUKUDA, Jun, NISHIMURA, Koichiro, YAMAZAKI, Katsuyoshi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Singapore The Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry 10.12.2019
Springer Nature Singapore
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Human antithrombin (AT) has two isoforms of which the predominant α-form is glycosylated on all four possible glycosylation sites and the lower abundant β-isoform lacks the oligosaccharide on Asn135. The main oligosaccharide structure of human AT consists of biantennary complex-type oligosaccharides lacking a core fucose. Generally, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells produce recombinant human AT (rhAT) with core-fucosylated oligosaccharides. However, rhAT lacking core-fucose oligosaccharides can be produced by POTELLIGENT® technology, which uses FUT8 knockout CHO cells in production. The rhAT has more variable glycan structures, such as tetra-antennary complex type, high-mannose type, and mannose 6-phosphate species as minor components compared to plasma-derived human AT (phAT). In addition, the site-specific glycan profile was different between two ATs. We evaluated the effect of these properties on efficacy and safety based on a comparison of rhAT made by that technology with phAT in terms of their respective oligosaccharide structures, site-specific oligosaccharide profiles, and the ratio of α- and β-forms. Although some structural differences were found between the rhAT and phAT, we concluded that these differences have no significant effect on the efficacy and safety of rhAT.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0910-6340
1348-2246
DOI:10.2116/analsci.19P181