Microcystic, Elongated and Fragmented Pattern Invasion Can Adversely Influence Preoperative Staging for Low-grade Endometrial Carcinoma

• Published in: Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences Vol. 20; no. 1; pp. 20 - 27
• Main Authors: Kuwahara, Ryo, Kido, Aki, Yajima, Ryo, Nishio, Naoko, Nakao, Kyoko, Kurata, Yasuhisa, Tanaka, Shiro, Minamiguchi, Sachiko, Baba, Tsukasa, Mandai, Masaki, Togashi, Kaori
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Japan Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 01.01.2021; Japan Science and Technology Agency
• Subjects: Aorta; Carcinoma; Computed tomography; Elongation; Endometrial cancer; endometrial carcinoma; Endometrium; Evaluation; Lymph nodes; Magnetic resonance imaging; Major Paper; Medical imaging; MELF; Metastases; Metastasis; Myometrium; preoperative staging; Statistical analysis; Surgery; Uterine cancer; computed tomography; preoperative staging; magnetic resonance imaging; endometrial carcinoma; MELF
• ISSN: 1347-3182; 1880-2206
• DOI: 10.2463/mrms.mp.2019-0153

Purpose: To investigate the influence of microcystic, elongated and fragmented (MELF) pattern invasion on preoperative evaluation of lymph node (LN) metastasis and myometrial invasion in patients with low-grade endometrial carcinoma.Methods: The study included 192 consecutive patients with low-grade endometrial carcinoma who underwent preoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), followed by surgery. One hundred sixty one of 192 patients underwent LN dissection and were analyzed for LN metastasis. All patients were analyzed for myometrial invasion. Presence of enlarged LN was evaluated by using size criteria on CT. Depth of myometrial invasion was evaluated on MRI using T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging comprehensively. Sensitivity and specificity for LN metastasis and deep myometrial invasion were evaluated for MELF group and non-MELF group. The difference of sensitivity between two groups was compared using Chi-square and Fisher’s exact test.Results: MELF pattern invasion was identified in 43/192 patients (22%). LN metastases were observed in 18/39 patients in MELF group and 6/122 patients in non-MELF group for pelvic LN and 11/29 patients in MELF group and 4/57 patients in non-MELF group for para-aortic LN. Sensitivity for the detection of pelvic LN metastasis in MELF group was significantly lower than in non-MELF group (16.7% vs 66.7%). As for the assessment of the deep myometiral invasion, pathological deep myometrial invasion were found in 31/43 patients in MELF group and 32/149 patients in non-MELF group. Sensitivity in MELF group showed lower values than in non-MELF group (54.8% vs 78.1% for reader 1, 54.8% vs 62.5% for reader 2), although there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.09 for reader 1 and P = 0.72 for reader 2).Conclusion: In case of low-grade endometrial carcinoma with MELF pattern invasion, preoperative staging by CT and MRI have a risk for underestimation.