The prognostic value of C-reactive protein/albumin ratio in human malignancies: an updated meta-analysis
This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of pretreatment C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) in human malignancies by an updated meta-analysis. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Wanfang databases were searched. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with their corr...
Saved in:
Published in | OncoTargets and therapy Vol. 10; pp. 3059 - 3070 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New Zealand
Dove Medical Press Limited
01.01.2017
Taylor & Francis Ltd Dove Medical Press |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | This study aims to investigate the prognostic value of pretreatment C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) in human malignancies by an updated meta-analysis.
PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Wanfang databases were searched. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as effective values.
A total of 25 studies with 12,097 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled results showed that high pretreatment CAR was associated with poor overall survival (OS) (HR =1.99, 95% CI: 1.65-2.40,
=0.000) and poor disease-free survival (HR =1.55, 95% CI: 1.34-1.79,
=0.000). In addition, high pretreatment CAR was associated with increased 5-year mortality (OR =2.74, 95% CI: 2.11-3.55,
=0.000). Moreover, subgroup analysis demonstrated that high CAR was associated with poor OS despite variations in publication year, country, sample size, CAR cut-off value and treatment. However, high CAR was associated with poor OS in human malignancies except colorectal cancer (HR =1.64, 95% CI: 0.96-2.80,
=0.069).
High pretreatment CAR indicates poor prognosis in human malignancies except colorectal cancer. Thus, pretreatment CAR serves as a prognostic marker in human malignancies and could be used in the evaluation of prognosis in clinical work. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 1178-6930 1178-6930 |
DOI: | 10.2147/ott.s137002 |