Macroscopic assessment of cartilage shear: Effects of counter-surface roughness, synovial fluid lubricant, and compression offset

Abstract During joint articulation, cartilage is subjected to compression, shear, and sliding, mechanical factors that regulate and affect cartilage metabolism. The objective of this study was to use an in vitro material-on-cartilage shear test to elucidate the effects of counter-surface roughness (...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of biomechanics Vol. 43; no. 9; pp. 1787 - 1793
Main Authors Nguyen, Quynhhoa T, Wong, Benjamin L, Chun, June, Yoon, Yeoung C, Talke, Frank E, Sah, Robert L
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Kidlington Elsevier Ltd 18.06.2010
Elsevier
Elsevier Limited
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract During joint articulation, cartilage is subjected to compression, shear, and sliding, mechanical factors that regulate and affect cartilage metabolism. The objective of this study was to use an in vitro material-on-cartilage shear test to elucidate the effects of counter-surface roughness ( P olished, M ildly rough, and R ough), lubricants (phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and bovine synovial fluid (bSF)), and compression offset on the shearing and sliding of normal human talar cartilage under dynamic lateral displacement. Peak shear stress ( σ xz,m ) and strain ( E xz,m ) increased with increasing platen roughness and compression offset, and were 30% higher with PBS than with bSF. Compared to PBS, bSF was more effective as a lubricant for P than for M and R platens as indicated by the higher reduction in kinetic friction coefficient (−60% vs. −20% and −19%, respectively), σ xz,m (−50% vs. −14% and −17%) and E xz,m (−54% vs. −19% and −17%). Cartilage shear and sliding were evident for all counter-surfaces either at low compression offset (10%) or with high lateral displacement (70%), regardless of lubricant. An increase in tissue shear occurred with either increased compression offset or increased surface roughness. This material and biomechanical test system allow control of cartilage σ xz,m and E xz,m , and hence, sliding magnitude, for an imposed lateral displacement. It therefore can facilitate study of cartilage mechanobiological responses to distinct regimes of cartilage loading and articulation, such as shear with variable amounts of sliding.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0021-9290
1873-2380
DOI:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.02.014