An international consensus approach to the management of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome in children

Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) emerged during the last decade as a disease largely of complement dysregulation. This advance facilitated the development of novel, rational treatment options targeting terminal complement activation, e.g., using an anti-C5 antibody (eculizumab). We review t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPediatric Nephrology Vol. 31; no. 1; pp. 15 - 39
Main Authors Loirat, Chantal, Fakhouri, Fadi, Ariceta, Gema, Besbas, Nesrin, Bitzan, Martin, Bjerre, Anna, Coppo, Rosanna, Emma, Francesco, Johnson, Sally, Karpman, Diana, Landau, Daniel, Langman, Craig B, Lapeyraque, Anne-Laure, Licht, Christoph, Nester, Carla, Pecoraro, Carmine, Riedl, Magdalena, van de Kar, Nicole C. A. J., Van de Walle, Johan, Vivarelli, Marina, Frémeaux-Bacchi, Véronique
Format Journal Article Book Review
LanguageEnglish
Published Berlin/Heidelberg Springer Berlin Heidelberg 01.01.2016
Springer
Springer Nature B.V
Springer Verlag
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) emerged during the last decade as a disease largely of complement dysregulation. This advance facilitated the development of novel, rational treatment options targeting terminal complement activation, e.g., using an anti-C5 antibody (eculizumab). We review treatment and patient management issues related to this therapeutic approach. We present consensus clinical practice recommendations generated by HUS International, an international expert group of clinicians and basic scientists with a focused interest in HUS. We aim to address the following questions of high relevance to daily clinical practice: Which complement investigations should be done and when? What is the importance of anti-factor H antibody detection? Who should be treated with eculizumab? Is plasma exchange therapy still needed? When should eculizumab therapy be initiated? How and when should complement blockade be monitored? Can the approved treatment schedule be modified? What approach should be taken to kidney and/or combined liver–kidney transplantation? How should we limit the risk of meningococcal infection under complement blockade therapy? A pressing question today regards the treatment duration. We discuss the need for prospective studies to establish evidence-based criteria for the continuation or cessation of anticomplement therapy in patients with and without identified complement mutations.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Instructional Material/Guideline-3
ObjectType-Feature-4
content type line 23
ObjectType-Review-1
ISSN:0931-041X
1432-198X
1432-198X
DOI:10.1007/s00467-015-3076-8