Effect of flowability on the flow rate, polymerization shrinkage, and mass change of flowable composites

As a lining or restoration material, flowable composites are popular due to their ease in use and agreeable marginal adaptation of tooth cavity. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate various properties of flowable composites which were claimed to be of high or low flowability by the manuf...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDental Materials Journal Vol. 34; no. 2; pp. 168 - 174
Main Authors KU, Ri-Mo, KO, Ching-Chang, JEONG, Chang-Mo, PARK, Mi-Gyoung, KIM, Hyung-Il, KWON, Yong Hoon
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Japanese
Published Japan The Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices 2015
Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:As a lining or restoration material, flowable composites are popular due to their ease in use and agreeable marginal adaptation of tooth cavity. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate various properties of flowable composites which were claimed to be of high or low flowability by the manufacturers. For the study, twelve flowable composites from six different manufacturers were used. Based on the manufacturers’ claim, they were divided into two groups: high or low flowability. The products grouped in high flowability showed significantly higher (p<0.05) flow rate (flow distance), polymerization shrinkage, and microhardness (on the top surface), regardless of light-curing unit, than those grouped in low flowability. On the other hand, water sorption and solubility showed nonsignificantly different values regardless of flowability. Through the study, flow rate had low correlation with microhardness (R<0.23), polymerization shrinkage (R<0.60), and water sorption and solubility (R<0.36) regardless of light-curing unit.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0287-4547
1881-1361
DOI:10.4012/dmj.2014-178