Influence of surface treatment of glass-ionomers on surface free energy and bond strength of resin composite

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of surface treatment of glass-ionomer (GIC) on bond strength of resin composite and surface free energies. Specimens were prepared and divided into three groups as follows: without pretreatment (control), phosphoric acid etching, and air-abras...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inDental Materials Journal Vol. 32; no. 5; pp. 702 - 708
Main Authors OTSUKA, Eiichiro, TSUJIMOTO, Akimasa, TAKAMIZAWA, Toshiki, FURUICHI, Tetsuya, YOKOKAWA, Miho, TSUBOTA, Keishi, MIYAZAKI, Masashi
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices 2013
Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of surface treatment of glass-ionomer (GIC) on bond strength of resin composite and surface free energies. Specimens were prepared and divided into three groups as follows: without pretreatment (control), phosphoric acid etching, and air-abrasion. Adhesive was applied and resin composite was bonded. For conventional GIC, acid etching or air-abrasion increased bond strength (8.5–8.8 MPa) when compared with controls (4.7 MPa); however, RMGIC resulted in significantly lower bond strengths (10.3–15.8 MPa) than in controls (14.2–20.5 MPa). The value of the γS− component increased when conventional GIC was treated with phosphoric acid or air-abrasion (60.1–60.5 mJ•m−2) when compared with controls (52.8 mJ•m–2).These results indicate that surface treatment of conventional GIC promoted higher bond strength to resin composite and higher Lewis-base components, but decreased bond strength for RMGIC.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0287-4547
1881-1361
DOI:10.4012/dmj.2013-117