Combined BRAF and MEK inhibition with PD-1 blockade immunotherapy in BRAF-mutant melanoma

Oncogene-targeted therapy with B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors induces a high initial response rate in patients with BRAF V600 -mutated melanoma, with a median duration of response of approximately 1 year 1 – 3 . Immunotherapy with antibodies...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature medicine Vol. 25; no. 6; pp. 936 - 940
Main Authors Ribas, Antoni, Lawrence, Donald, Atkinson, Victoria, Agarwal, Sachin, Miller, Wilson H., Carlino, Matteo S., Fisher, Rosalie, Long, Georgina V., Hodi, F. Stephen, Tsoi, Jennifer, Grasso, Catherine S., Mookerjee, Bijoyesh, Zhao, Qing, Ghori, Razi, Moreno, Blanca Homet, Ibrahim, Nageatte, Hamid, Omid
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published New York Nature Publishing Group US 01.06.2019
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Oncogene-targeted therapy with B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors induces a high initial response rate in patients with BRAF V600 -mutated melanoma, with a median duration of response of approximately 1 year 1 – 3 . Immunotherapy with antibodies to programmed death 1 (PD-1) produces lower response rates but with long response duration. Preclinical models suggest that combining BRAF and MEK inhibitors with PD-1 blockade therapy improves antitumor activity 4 – 6 , which may provide additional treatment options for patients unlikely to have long-lasting responses to either mode of therapy alone. We enrolled 15 patients with BRAF V600 -mutated metastatic melanoma in a first-in-human clinical trial of dabrafenib, trametinib and pembrolizumab ( NCT02130466 ). Eleven patients (73%) experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events, the most common being elevation of liver function tests and pyrexia, most of which resolved with drug interruption or discontinuation of either the anti-PD-1 antibody or the targeted therapy combination. Eleven patients (73%; 95% confidence interval = 45–92%) had an objective response, and six (40%; 95% confidence interval = 16–68%) continued with a response at a median follow-up of 27 months (range = 10.3–38.4+ months) for all patients. This study suggests that this triple-combined therapy may benefit a subset of patients with BRAF V600 -mutated metastatic melanoma by increasing the frequency of long-lasting antitumor responses. Triple therapy combining BRAF and MEK inhibitors with immune checkpoint blockade may benefit a subset of patients with BRAF V600 -mutated metastatic melanoma.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
A.R., O.H., G.V.L., B.M. and B.H.M. conceived, designed or planned the study. V.A., B.H.M., M.S.C., O.H., F.S.H., G.V.L., N.I. and A.R. acquired the data. Q.Z., B.H.M., F.S.H., G.V.L., B.M., N.I. and A.R. analyzed the data. V.A., B.H.M., M.S.C., F.S.H., G.V.L., B.M., N.I. and A.R. interpreted the results. J.T. and C.S.G., together with R.G., analyzed the genomic data. A.R. wrote the first draft of the manuscript, with contributions from Q.Z., V.A., B.H.M., O.H. and N.I. M.S.C., O.H., F.S.H., G.V.L., B.M., N.I. and A.R. critically reviewed or revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. All authors reviewed the interim drafts and final version of the manuscript, and agreed with its content and submission. All authors had access to all of the relevant study data and related analyses, and vouch for the completeness and accuracy of the presented data. All authors agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work and will ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Author contributions
ISSN:1078-8956
1546-170X
DOI:10.1038/s41591-019-0476-5