Imitation explains the propagation, not the stability of animal culture
For acquired behaviour to count as cultural, two conditions must be met: it must propagate in a social group, and it must remain stable across generations in the process of propagation. It is commonly assumed that imitation is the mechanism that explains both the spread of animal culture and its sta...
Saved in:
Published in | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Vol. 277; no. 1681; pp. 651 - 659 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
England
The Royal Society
22.02.2010
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 0962-8452 1471-2954 1471-2954 1471-2945 |
DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2009.1615 |
Cover
Loading…
Abstract | For acquired behaviour to count as cultural, two conditions must be met: it must propagate in a social group, and it must remain stable across generations in the process of propagation. It is commonly assumed that imitation is the mechanism that explains both the spread of animal culture and its stability. We review the literature on transmission chain studies in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and other animals, and we use a formal model to argue that imitation, which may well play a major role in the propagation of animal culture, cannot be considered faithful enough to explain its stability. We consider the contribution that other psychological and ecological factors might make to the stability of animal culture observed in the wild. |
---|---|
AbstractList | For acquired behaviour to count as cultural, two conditions must be met: it must propagate in a social group, and it must remain stable across generations in the process of propagation. It is commonly assumed that imitation is the mechanism that explains both the spread of animal culture and its stability. We review the literature on transmission chain studies in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and other animals, and we use a formal model to argue that imitation, which may well play a major role in the propagation of animal culture, cannot be considered faithful enough to explain its stability. We consider the contribution that other psychological and ecological factors might make to the stability of animal culture observed in the wild. For acquired behaviour to count as cultural, two conditions must be met: it must propagate in a social group, and it must remain stable across generations in the process of propagation. It is commonly assumed that imitation is the mechanism that explains both the spread of animal culture and its stability. We review the literature on transmission chain studies in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and other animals, and we use a formal model to argue that imitation, which may well play a major role in the propagation of animal culture, cannot be considered faithful enough to explain its stability. We consider the contribution that other psychological and ecological factors might make to the stability of animal culture observed in the wild.For acquired behaviour to count as cultural, two conditions must be met: it must propagate in a social group, and it must remain stable across generations in the process of propagation. It is commonly assumed that imitation is the mechanism that explains both the spread of animal culture and its stability. We review the literature on transmission chain studies in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and other animals, and we use a formal model to argue that imitation, which may well play a major role in the propagation of animal culture, cannot be considered faithful enough to explain its stability. We consider the contribution that other psychological and ecological factors might make to the stability of animal culture observed in the wild. For acquired behaviour to count as cultural, two conditions must be met: it must propagate in a social group, and it must remain stable across generations in the process of propagation. It is commonly assumed that imitation is the mechanism that explains both the spread of animal culture and its stability. We review the literature on transmission chain studies in chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ) and other animals, and we use a formal model to argue that imitation, which may well play a major role in the propagation of animal culture, cannot be considered faithful enough to explain its stability. We consider the contribution that other psychological and ecological factors might make to the stability of animal culture observed in the wild. For acquired behaviour to count as cultural, two conditions must be met: it must propagate in a social group, and it must remain stable across generations in the process of propagation. It is commonly assumed that imitation is the mechanism that explains both the spread of animal culture and its stability. We review the literature on transmission chain studies in chimpanzees ( |
Author | Sperber, Dan Claidière, Nicolas |
AuthorAffiliation | Département d'Etudes Cognitives , Institut Jean Nicod , Ecole Normale Supérieure, 29, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris , France |
AuthorAffiliation_xml | – name: Département d'Etudes Cognitives , Institut Jean Nicod , Ecole Normale Supérieure, 29, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris , France |
Author_xml | – sequence: 1 givenname: Nicolas surname: Claidière fullname: Claidière, Nicolas email: nicolas.claidiere@normalesup.org organization: E-mail: nicolas.claidiere@normalesup.org – sequence: 2 givenname: Dan surname: Sperber fullname: Sperber, Dan organization: Département d'Etudes Cognitives, Institut Jean Nicod, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 29, rue d'Ulm, 75005 Paris, France |
BackLink | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19889707$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed |
BookMark | eNp9Uk1v0zAYjtAQ6wZXbqDcuJDizzi-II2JlYkC04BdLSdxWndpHGynLPx63KYUWrSdIuf5ev28PomOGtOoKHoOwRgCnr2xrs3HCAA-himkj6IRJAwmiFNyFI0AT1GSEYqOoxPnFiDQaEafRMeQZxlngI2iyeVSe-m1aWJ119ZSNy72cxW31rRytgFex43xm5_Oy1zX2vexqWLZ6KWs46KrfWfV0-hxJWunnm2_p9H3i_ffzj8k0y-Ty_OzaVKkjPgEVUWKOMpzmZcFIJRXJUeQ8UoqAnFJIeU5SHmJy0qVBEBQolQqzMIxwyVT-DR6O_i2Xb5UZaEab2UtWhuGsb0wUot9pNFzMTMrgTKCUg6CwautgTU_OuW8WGpXqLqWjTKdEwzjDFBKcGC-_Ddql_GnvEAYD4TCGuesqv5SgFhvR6y3I9bbEevtBAE5EBTb8sOour5fhgeZNX3o1hRa-V4sTGebcLxfdfuQ6vrr1bsVYkzDNIMCZBgChhhm4pdut1aMCe1cp8SGsm__f9qLIW3hvLG7IgigIIXpGk8GXDuv7na4tLciDalU3GREXNzAydXHT5_FNPCvB_5cz-Y_tVVi7xqb9CL0FrYslLR1v50lXAUfjlp1dXghZRVM6YOmpm-tyw_kK4h_A3VuFIA |
CitedBy_id | crossref_primary_10_1016_j_tics_2015_08_005 crossref_primary_10_1111_j_1439_0310_2011_01930_x crossref_primary_10_1111_conl_12599 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0256901 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41467_018_04728_1 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1213320109 crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2015_1405 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0287845 crossref_primary_10_1007_s13347_016_0228_0 crossref_primary_10_1017_S0140525X11002032 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2015_00091 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12110_014_9192_5 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_devpsych_121318_084848 crossref_primary_10_1002_ajp_22342 crossref_primary_10_1017_ehs_2021_47 crossref_primary_10_1093_bjps_axy052 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2013_05_036 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2010_0343 crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2020_2001 crossref_primary_10_1073_pnas_1620743114 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10539_015_9487_x crossref_primary_10_1111_zygo_12904 crossref_primary_10_1038_nature12774 crossref_primary_10_4161_cib_3_4_11829 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_jhevol_2012_04_008 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2014_0115 crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2014_1541 crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2019_0729 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsif_2022_0238 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_cub_2018_03_004 crossref_primary_10_1186_s12862_017_0889_z crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2010_0705 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_evolhumbehav_2017_12_007 crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2018_0088 crossref_primary_10_1146_annurev_ecolsys_110218_025040 crossref_primary_10_1163_15700682_12341375 crossref_primary_10_3917_anso_162_0351 crossref_primary_10_1163_15685373_12342188 crossref_primary_10_1007_s10071_013_0636_9 crossref_primary_10_1007_s11692_020_09516_8 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2014_02_026 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_shpsa_2021_10_012 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_anbehav_2014_02_023 crossref_primary_10_1007_s12110_021_09394_9 crossref_primary_10_1371_journal_pone_0039629 crossref_primary_10_1016_j_evolhumbehav_2015_01_003 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2010_0312 crossref_primary_10_3389_fpsyg_2021_560653 crossref_primary_10_1038_s41562_019_0802_4 crossref_primary_10_1098_rsfs_2013_0030 crossref_primary_10_1098_rstb_2017_0050 crossref_primary_10_1086_686317 |
Cites_doi | 10.1073/pnas.0500232102 10.1002/ajp.10055 10.1038/414707a 10.1016/B978-012273965-1/50003-0 10.1098/rspb.2006.3733 10.1007/BF02436405 10.1038/35046199 10.3758/BF03196005 10.1126/science.1078004 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.12.002 10.3758/BF03197974 10.1556/JEP.2007.1009 10.1038/nature04047 10.1007/s10329-003-0065-5 10.1007/BF02382016 10.1126/science.282.5394.1708 10.1006/anbe.1995.0164 10.1093/beheco/9.5.493 10.1007/s10071-006-0069-9 10.1006/anbe.1996.0318 10.1007/BF01794457 10.1007/s10071-007-0135-y 10.1016/j.tpb.2007.03.003 10.1086/381007 10.1073/pnas.0606015103 10.1163/156853907780425712 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.031 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.07.016 10.1086/318441 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80001-8 10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00018-X 10.1098/rspb.2000.1015 10.1098/rspb.2007.1318 10.1126/science.202.4370.899 10.1126/science.1070268 10.1007/s10539-005-9012-8 10.1016/0376-6357(92)90040-K 10.3758/BF03205282 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.06.014 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.04.021 10.1093/beheco/13.6.827 10.1098/rspb.2008.1794 10.1163/156853907781890959 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050139 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0183 10.1037/0735-7036.109.1.99 10.1038/21415 10.1007/BF02692251 10.1098/rspb.2005.3429 10.1006/anbe.2001.1820 10.1006/anbe.1993.1281 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80131-6 10.1017/S0140525X0100396X 10.1016/j.tpb.2007.04.003 10.1073/pnas.0707930104 10.1016/j.tics.2004.06.002 10.1002/ajp.20544 10.1037/h0044182 |
ContentType | Journal Article |
Copyright | Copyright 2010 The Royal Society 2009 The Royal Society 2009 The Royal Society 2009 |
Copyright_xml | – notice: Copyright 2010 The Royal Society – notice: 2009 The Royal Society – notice: 2009 The Royal Society 2009 |
DBID | BSCLL AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2009.1615 |
DatabaseName | Istex CrossRef Medline MEDLINE MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE MEDLINE PubMed MEDLINE - Academic PubMed Central (Full Participant titles) |
DatabaseTitle | CrossRef MEDLINE Medline Complete MEDLINE with Full Text PubMed MEDLINE (Ovid) MEDLINE - Academic |
DatabaseTitleList | MEDLINE - Academic MEDLINE CrossRef |
Database_xml | – sequence: 1 dbid: NPM name: PubMed url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed sourceTypes: Index Database – sequence: 2 dbid: EIF name: MEDLINE url: https://proxy.k.utb.cz/login?url=https://www.webofscience.com/wos/medline/basic-search sourceTypes: Index Database |
DeliveryMethod | fulltext_linktorsrc |
Discipline | Sciences (General) Biology |
EISSN | 1471-2954 1471-2945 |
EndPage | 659 |
ExternalDocumentID | PMC2842690 19889707 10_1098_rspb_2009_1615 40506165 ark_67375_V84_FV1GPKMN_L royprsb_rspb_2009_1615v1 |
Genre | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Journal Article Review |
GroupedDBID | - 02 08R 0R 0VX 29P 2WC 36Y 3O- 4.4 53G 55 5RE 85S 8WZ A6W ABBHK ABEFU ABFLS ABPTK ACIWK ACMKX ACNCT ACPRK ADACO ADBBV ADBIT ADULT ADZLD AEUPB AFRAH ALMA_UNASSIGNED_HOLDINGS AS BAWUL BGBPD CAG COF CS3 DCCCD DIK DNJUQ DOOOF DWIUU E3Z EBS EJD F5P FRP GJ GX1 H13 HGD HQ3 HTVGU HYE HZ JLS JPM JSG JSODD JST K-O KQ8 MVM O0- O9- OK1 OP1 RHF ROL RPM RRY SA0 V1E WOQ X X7M ZXP --- -~X 0R~ AACGO AANCE ABPLY ABTLG ABXSQ ACQIA ADACV ADIYS AEXZC AJZGM ALMYZ AOIJS AQVQM BSCLL BTFSW HZ~ IPSME JAAYA JBMMH JENOY JHFFW JKQEH JLXEF MRS TR2 W8F ~02 ACHIC ACRPL ADNMO ADQXQ AGPVY AGQPQ AS~ AAYXX CITATION CGR CUY CVF ECM EIF NPM 7X8 5PM |
ID | FETCH-LOGICAL-c674t-2fc6292bbabdc0459fd92179fae413d5159b069d3dfed4010d26ae37dfe83d7e3 |
ISSN | 0962-8452 1471-2954 |
IngestDate | Thu Aug 21 18:45:04 EDT 2025 Fri Jul 11 15:01:55 EDT 2025 Wed Feb 19 01:46:43 EST 2025 Tue Jul 01 02:06:45 EDT 2025 Thu Apr 24 23:09:49 EDT 2025 Wed Jan 17 02:37:38 EST 2024 Tue May 24 16:18:02 EDT 2022 Thu Jul 03 21:37:57 EDT 2025 Wed Oct 30 09:38:26 EDT 2024 Tue Jan 05 22:12:57 EST 2021 Mon May 06 10:48:03 EDT 2019 |
IsDoiOpenAccess | false |
IsOpenAccess | true |
IsPeerReviewed | true |
IsScholarly | true |
Issue | 1681 |
Language | English |
LinkModel | OpenURL |
MergedId | FETCHMERGED-LOGICAL-c674t-2fc6292bbabdc0459fd92179fae413d5159b069d3dfed4010d26ae37dfe83d7e3 |
Notes | istex:85B004F16EBE818E51028A72BF8ACC288202009A href:rspb20091615.pdf ArticleID:rspb20091615 ark:/67375/V84-FV1GPKMN-L ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 ObjectType-Review-3 content type line 23 |
PMID | 19889707 |
PQID | 733805543 |
PQPubID | 23479 |
PageCount | 9 |
ParticipantIDs | crossref_primary_10_1098_rspb_2009_1615 istex_primary_ark_67375_V84_FV1GPKMN_L crossref_citationtrail_10_1098_rspb_2009_1615 jstor_primary_40506165 royalsociety_journals_10_1098_rspb_2009_1615 pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_2842690 highwire_royalsociety_royprsb_rspb_2009_1615v1 pubmed_primary_19889707 proquest_miscellaneous_733805543 royalsociety_journals_RSPBv277i1681_0831072737_zip_rspb_277_issue_1681_rspb_2009_1615_rspb_2009_1615 |
ProviderPackageCode | RHF CITATION AAYXX |
PublicationCentury | 2000 |
PublicationDate | 2010-02-22 |
PublicationDateYYYYMMDD | 2010-02-22 |
PublicationDate_xml | – month: 02 year: 2010 text: 2010-02-22 day: 22 |
PublicationDecade | 2010 |
PublicationPlace | England |
PublicationPlace_xml | – name: England |
PublicationTitle | Proceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences |
PublicationTitleAbbrev | Proc. R. Soc. B |
PublicationTitleAlternate | Proc. R. Soc. B |
PublicationYear | 2010 |
Publisher | The Royal Society |
Publisher_xml | – name: The Royal Society |
References | e_1_3_2_28_1 e_1_3_2_49_1 Galef B. G. (e_1_3_2_13_1) 1988 e_1_3_2_20_1 e_1_3_2_41_1 e_1_3_2_22_1 e_1_3_2_43_1 e_1_3_2_24_1 e_1_3_2_45_1 e_1_3_2_26_1 Fisher J. (e_1_3_2_12_1) 1949; 42 e_1_3_2_62_1 e_1_3_2_60_1 McGrew W. C. (e_1_3_2_39_1) 2001; 42 e_1_3_2_16_1 e_1_3_2_9_1 e_1_3_2_18_1 e_1_3_2_7_1 e_1_3_2_31_1 e_1_3_2_54_1 e_1_3_2_10_1 e_1_3_2_33_1 e_1_3_2_52_1 e_1_3_2_35_1 e_1_3_2_58_1 e_1_3_2_14_1 e_1_3_2_37_1 e_1_3_2_56_1 e_1_3_2_3_1 Boyd R. (e_1_3_2_5_1) 1985 e_1_3_2_50_1 e_1_3_2_27_1 e_1_3_2_29_1 e_1_3_2_42_1 e_1_3_2_21_1 e_1_3_2_44_1 e_1_3_2_63_1 e_1_3_2_23_1 e_1_3_2_46_1 e_1_3_2_25_1 e_1_3_2_48_1 e_1_3_2_61_1 e_1_3_2_40_1 e_1_3_2_17_1 e_1_3_2_38_1 e_1_3_2_8_1 e_1_3_2_19_1 Sherif M. (e_1_3_2_47_1) 1936 e_1_3_2_2_1 e_1_3_2_30_1 e_1_3_2_55_1 e_1_3_2_11_1 e_1_3_2_32_1 e_1_3_2_53_1 e_1_3_2_6_1 e_1_3_2_34_1 e_1_3_2_59_1 e_1_3_2_4_1 e_1_3_2_15_1 e_1_3_2_36_1 e_1_3_2_57_1 e_1_3_2_51_1 16938863 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 12;103(37):13878-83 11117730 - Nature. 2000 Nov 30;408(6812):537 11742382 - Nature. 2001 Dec 13;414(6865):707 17503965 - PLoS Biol. 2007 May;5(5):e139 12511649 - Science. 2003 Jan 3;299(5603):102-5 17968009 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 6;104(45):17588-92 15504013 - Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Aug 7;271 Suppl 5:S344-6 12029130 - Science. 2002 May 24;296(5572):1452-5 14450695 - J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1961 May;62:649-58 16113685 - Nature. 2005 Sep 29;437(7059):737-40 15947077 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jun 21;102(25):8939-43 18204869 - Anim Cogn. 2008 Jul;11(3):449-56 11530544 - Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Apr;24(2):309-24; discussion 324-82 12454957 - Am J Primatol. 2002 Nov;58(3):133-48 15095043 - Primates. 2004 Apr;45(2):113-8 17971322 - Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jan 22;275(1631):187-93 9236013 - Anim Behav. 1997 Jun;53(6):1161-9 17561216 - Theor Popul Biol. 2007 Dec;72(4):504-12 17164200 - Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 7;274(1608):367-72 17752463 - Science. 1978 Nov 24;202(4370):899-901 15161139 - Learn Behav. 2004 Feb;32(1):36-52 24222403 - Hum Nat. 1992 Jun;3(2):157-78 24896467 - Behav Processes. 1992;27(1):53-64 10722223 - Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Feb 22;267(1441):403-13 18275983 - J Hum Evol. 2008 Jul;55(1):48-59 17929373 - Anim Cogn. 2007 Jul;10(3):283-92 7705065 - J Comp Psychol. 1995 Mar;109(1):99-101 17555968 - Curr Biol. 2007 Jun 19;17(12):1038-43 18459112 - Am J Primatol. 2008 Jul;70(7):699-702 16600891 - Proc Biol Sci. 2006 May 7;273(1590):1127-33 9831562 - Science. 1998 Nov 27;282(5394):1708-11 15335460 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Aug;8(8):341-6 10385119 - Nature. 1999 Jun 17;399(6737):682-5 19141416 - Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Apr 7;276(1660):1269-76 17442355 - Theor Popul Biol. 2007 Aug;72(1):52-66 |
References_xml | – ident: e_1_3_2_29_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0500232102 – ident: e_1_3_2_23_1 doi: 10.1002/ajp.10055 – ident: e_1_3_2_25_1 doi: 10.1038/414707a – ident: e_1_3_2_51_1 doi: 10.1016/B978-012273965-1/50003-0 – ident: e_1_3_2_4_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3733 – ident: e_1_3_2_54_1 doi: 10.1007/BF02436405 – ident: e_1_3_2_44_1 doi: 10.1038/35046199 – ident: e_1_3_2_60_1 doi: 10.3758/BF03196005 – ident: e_1_3_2_55_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1078004 – start-page: 3 volume-title: Social learning psychological and biological perspectives year: 1988 ident: e_1_3_2_13_1 – ident: e_1_3_2_46_1 doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2007.12.002 – ident: e_1_3_2_32_1 doi: 10.3758/BF03197974 – ident: e_1_3_2_11_1 doi: 10.1556/JEP.2007.1009 – ident: e_1_3_2_61_1 doi: 10.1038/nature04047 – ident: e_1_3_2_22_1 doi: 10.1007/s10329-003-0065-5 – ident: e_1_3_2_50_1 doi: 10.1007/BF02382016 – ident: e_1_3_2_58_1 doi: 10.1126/science.282.5394.1708 – ident: e_1_3_2_15_1 doi: 10.1006/anbe.1995.0164 – ident: e_1_3_2_34_1 doi: 10.1093/beheco/9.5.493 – ident: e_1_3_2_3_1 doi: 10.1007/s10071-006-0069-9 – ident: e_1_3_2_33_1 doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0318 – ident: e_1_3_2_28_1 doi: 10.1007/BF01794457 – ident: e_1_3_2_38_1 doi: 10.1007/s10071-007-0135-y – ident: e_1_3_2_42_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2007.03.003 – ident: e_1_3_2_43_1 doi: 10.1086/381007 – ident: e_1_3_2_21_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606015103 – ident: e_1_3_2_35_1 doi: 10.1163/156853907780425712 – ident: e_1_3_2_62_1 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.031 – volume-title: The psychology of social norms year: 1936 ident: e_1_3_2_47_1 – ident: e_1_3_2_20_1 doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.07.016 – volume: 42 start-page: 148 year: 2001 ident: e_1_3_2_39_1 article-title: Intergroup differences in a social custom of wild chimpanzees: the grooming hand clasp of the Mahale Mountains publication-title: Curr. Anthropol. doi: 10.1086/318441 – ident: e_1_3_2_7_1 doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80001-8 – volume: 42 start-page: 347 year: 1949 ident: e_1_3_2_12_1 article-title: The opening of milk bottles by birds publication-title: Br. Birds – ident: e_1_3_2_18_1 doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00018-X – ident: e_1_3_2_24_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1015 – ident: e_1_3_2_10_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1318 – ident: e_1_3_2_8_1 doi: 10.1126/science.202.4370.899 – ident: e_1_3_2_40_1 doi: 10.1126/science.1070268 – ident: e_1_3_2_48_1 doi: 10.1007/s10539-005-9012-8 – ident: e_1_3_2_31_1 doi: 10.1016/0376-6357(92)90040-K – volume-title: Culture and the evolutionary process year: 1985 ident: e_1_3_2_5_1 – ident: e_1_3_2_30_1 doi: 10.3758/BF03205282 – ident: e_1_3_2_49_1 doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.06.014 – ident: e_1_3_2_52_1 doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.04.021 – ident: e_1_3_2_2_1 doi: 10.1093/beheco/13.6.827 – ident: e_1_3_2_53_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1794 – ident: e_1_3_2_41_1 doi: 10.1163/156853907781890959 – ident: e_1_3_2_37_1 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050139 – ident: e_1_3_2_57_1 doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0183 – ident: e_1_3_2_17_1 doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.109.1.99 – ident: e_1_3_2_59_1 doi: 10.1038/21415 – ident: e_1_3_2_14_1 doi: 10.1007/BF02692251 – ident: e_1_3_2_26_1 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3429 – ident: e_1_3_2_9_1 doi: 10.1006/anbe.2001.1820 – ident: e_1_3_2_19_1 doi: 10.1006/anbe.1993.1281 – ident: e_1_3_2_16_1 doi: 10.1016/0003-3472(95)80131-6 – ident: e_1_3_2_45_1 doi: 10.1017/S0140525X0100396X – ident: e_1_3_2_56_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2007.04.003 – ident: e_1_3_2_36_1 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707930104 – ident: e_1_3_2_6_1 doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.06.002 – ident: e_1_3_2_63_1 doi: 10.1002/ajp.20544 – ident: e_1_3_2_27_1 doi: 10.1037/h0044182 – reference: 17164200 - Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 7;274(1608):367-72 – reference: 14450695 - J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1961 May;62:649-58 – reference: 17971322 - Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Jan 22;275(1631):187-93 – reference: 17555968 - Curr Biol. 2007 Jun 19;17(12):1038-43 – reference: 15947077 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jun 21;102(25):8939-43 – reference: 17929373 - Anim Cogn. 2007 Jul;10(3):283-92 – reference: 15335460 - Trends Cogn Sci. 2004 Aug;8(8):341-6 – reference: 18204869 - Anim Cogn. 2008 Jul;11(3):449-56 – reference: 24222403 - Hum Nat. 1992 Jun;3(2):157-78 – reference: 15161139 - Learn Behav. 2004 Feb;32(1):36-52 – reference: 9236013 - Anim Behav. 1997 Jun;53(6):1161-9 – reference: 17752463 - Science. 1978 Nov 24;202(4370):899-901 – reference: 11530544 - Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Apr;24(2):309-24; discussion 324-82 – reference: 24896467 - Behav Processes. 1992;27(1):53-64 – reference: 17503965 - PLoS Biol. 2007 May;5(5):e139 – reference: 17442355 - Theor Popul Biol. 2007 Aug;72(1):52-66 – reference: 12454957 - Am J Primatol. 2002 Nov;58(3):133-48 – reference: 12511649 - Science. 2003 Jan 3;299(5603):102-5 – reference: 7705065 - J Comp Psychol. 1995 Mar;109(1):99-101 – reference: 11117730 - Nature. 2000 Nov 30;408(6812):537 – reference: 11742382 - Nature. 2001 Dec 13;414(6865):707 – reference: 10385119 - Nature. 1999 Jun 17;399(6737):682-5 – reference: 17968009 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 6;104(45):17588-92 – reference: 12029130 - Science. 2002 May 24;296(5572):1452-5 – reference: 17561216 - Theor Popul Biol. 2007 Dec;72(4):504-12 – reference: 15504013 - Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Aug 7;271 Suppl 5:S344-6 – reference: 16938863 - Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 12;103(37):13878-83 – reference: 10722223 - Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Feb 22;267(1441):403-13 – reference: 15095043 - Primates. 2004 Apr;45(2):113-8 – reference: 18275983 - J Hum Evol. 2008 Jul;55(1):48-59 – reference: 18459112 - Am J Primatol. 2008 Jul;70(7):699-702 – reference: 16113685 - Nature. 2005 Sep 29;437(7059):737-40 – reference: 16600891 - Proc Biol Sci. 2006 May 7;273(1590):1127-33 – reference: 19141416 - Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Apr 7;276(1660):1269-76 – reference: 9831562 - Science. 1998 Nov 27;282(5394):1708-11 |
SSID | ssj0009585 |
Score | 2.2627513 |
SecondaryResourceType | review_article |
Snippet | For acquired behaviour to count as cultural, two conditions must be met: it must propagate in a social group, and it must
remain stable across generations in... For acquired behaviour to count as cultural, two conditions must be met: it must propagate in a social group, and it must remain stable across generations in... |
SourceID | pubmedcentral proquest pubmed crossref royalsociety jstor istex highwire |
SourceType | Open Access Repository Aggregation Database Index Database Enrichment Source Publisher |
StartPage | 651 |
SubjectTerms | Animal Culture Animals Behavior, Animal - physiology Carrots Chimpanzees Communities Cultural Evolution Culture Ecological psychology Foraging Imitation Imitative Behavior - physiology Learning - physiology Models, Theoretical Observational learning Pan troglodytes Rats Social behavior Social influence |
Title | Imitation explains the propagation, not the stability of animal culture |
URI | http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2009/11/03/rspb.2009.1615.abstract https://api.istex.fr/ark:/67375/V84-FV1GPKMN-L/fulltext.pdf https://www.jstor.org/stable/40506165 https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/full/10.1098/rspb.2009.1615 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19889707 https://www.proquest.com/docview/733805543 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/PMC2842690 |
Volume | 277 |
hasFullText | 1 |
inHoldings | 1 |
isFullTextHit | |
isPrint | |
link | http://utb.summon.serialssolutions.com/2.0.0/link/0/eLvHCXMwnV3db9MwELdgCIkXxAaD8KU8ID7EUtIkjZ1HNtYN1pWKdVPfrCSOoWJLq7abYH89d7bjNqUVHy9R416c2Pfz-c4-3xHyAsZP1ipEASONFV4EU4KXwjTlSRkBfRYIppL2HXfjw9Po06A1mGfpVKdLZlkjv155ruR_uAplwFc8JfsPnLWVQgH8Bv7CFTgM17_i8ccLE2EbA_Wfp-jtok8-gSX8VbttQA-WI3VeEVcNlCes2lNPy-EFhgZRgTdq7kA9O6VNKwcCvcZgHDwbb3cVKIZWbJpZ1Grnexh3cqi24Jle4lZ4Sy3ByRiYqbHywaDTLDzgnnngBQtrkU2Y1zzcJtRTyYoyI2ADk6jFICnWOVqMxIx1vNnfJLmf4OkEsO0zHVQUNdP5nFXt03c_8_Zpp8P7-4P-TXIL3hQ0qyUbG3lZ5WW1X2Yjd7J39drrmkkVLRqMFhxvPyp_1VWWyAqH2gkyZqr5sqCw9O-Ru8bScN9r2GySG0W5RW5rtv3cIptGqk_d1yb0-Jv75MAiyq0Q5QIA3AVE7biAJ1Vo8eSOpKvx5Bo8PSCn7f3-3qFnUm14eUyjmRfIPA6SIMvSTOSg5SdSJGCsJjItQMsRqPRmfpyIUMhCgEnuiyBOi5DCLQsFLcJtslGOyuIRcaO4ySSVrJX6MqIiBxMuYzKkCVYVS-kQr-pmnps2YTqUc679IRhHtmB61IQjWxzyytKPdQSWtZSNimt8sf_xZjyZZkvkV02HHK15AAnxrAhmui4w0rh5rMn9cKkajvtkfCygYS8VUuxXppPv6DZJW_yMRbx91jzoHR13ecch2wpKlhCMJlCrY2iAW2GLg5THrbu0LEaXU07DkPmg-YcOeaihNu-LhLGE-tQhtAZCS4AB5Ov_lMNvKpA8qKZBnPgO2am13ki46dpuFqvJv5z0dq9gCA5xiHOVwhCtI8qvh2NTB6VcSQGuSJY6sn77-M-d8YTcmQump2RjNrksnoGNMMueKxnwC_YUFZ4 |
linkProvider | National Library of Medicine |
openUrl | ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info%3Aofi%2Fenc%3AUTF-8&rfr_id=info%3Asid%2Fsummon.serialssolutions.com&rft_val_fmt=info%3Aofi%2Ffmt%3Akev%3Amtx%3Ajournal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Imitation+explains+the+propagation%2C+not+the+stability+of+animal+culture&rft.jtitle=Proceedings+of+the+Royal+Society.+B%2C+Biological+sciences&rft.au=Claidi%C3%A8re%2C+Nicolas&rft.au=Sperber%2C+Dan&rft.date=2010-02-22&rft.issn=1471-2954&rft.eissn=1471-2954&rft.volume=277&rft.issue=1681&rft.spage=651&rft_id=info:doi/10.1098%2Frspb.2009.1615&rft.externalDBID=NO_FULL_TEXT |
thumbnail_l | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/lc.gif&issn=0962-8452&client=summon |
thumbnail_m | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/mc.gif&issn=0962-8452&client=summon |
thumbnail_s | http://covers-cdn.summon.serialssolutions.com/index.aspx?isbn=/sc.gif&issn=0962-8452&client=summon |