Imitation explains the propagation, not the stability of animal culture

For acquired behaviour to count as cultural, two conditions must be met: it must propagate in a social group, and it must remain stable across generations in the process of propagation. It is commonly assumed that imitation is the mechanism that explains both the spread of animal culture and its sta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the Royal Society. B, Biological sciences Vol. 277; no. 1681; pp. 651 - 659
Main Authors Claidière, Nicolas, Sperber, Dan
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England The Royal Society 22.02.2010
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:For acquired behaviour to count as cultural, two conditions must be met: it must propagate in a social group, and it must remain stable across generations in the process of propagation. It is commonly assumed that imitation is the mechanism that explains both the spread of animal culture and its stability. We review the literature on transmission chain studies in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and other animals, and we use a formal model to argue that imitation, which may well play a major role in the propagation of animal culture, cannot be considered faithful enough to explain its stability. We consider the contribution that other psychological and ecological factors might make to the stability of animal culture observed in the wild.
Bibliography:istex:85B004F16EBE818E51028A72BF8ACC288202009A
href:rspb20091615.pdf
ArticleID:rspb20091615
ark:/67375/V84-FV1GPKMN-L
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0962-8452
1471-2954
1471-2954
1471-2945
DOI:10.1098/rspb.2009.1615