Is Pay for Performance Detrimental to Innovation?
Previous research in economics shows that compensation based on the pay-for-performance principle is effective in inducing higher levels of effort and productivity. On the other hand, research in psychology argues that performance-based financial incentives inhibit creativity and innovation. How sho...
Saved in:
Published in | Management science Vol. 59; no. 7; pp. 1496 - 1513 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Linthicum
INFORMS
01.07.2013
Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Previous research in economics shows that compensation based on the pay-for-performance principle is effective in inducing higher levels of effort and productivity. On the other hand, research in psychology argues that performance-based financial incentives inhibit creativity and innovation. How should managerial compensation be structured if the goal is to induce managers to pursue more innovative business strategies? In a controlled laboratory setting, we provide evidence that the combination of tolerance for early failure and reward for long-term success is effective in motivating innovation. Subjects under such an incentive scheme explore more and are more likely to discover a novel business strategy than subjects under fixed-wage and standard pay-for-performance incentive schemes. We also find evidence that the threat of termination can undermine incentives for innovation, whereas golden parachutes can alleviate these innovation-reducing effects.
This paper was accepted by David Hsu, entrepreneurship and innovation. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0025-1909 1526-5501 |
DOI: | 10.1287/mnsc.1120.1683 |