Better safe than sorry?—On the influence of learned safety on pain perception

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 18; no. 11; p. e0289047
• Main Authors: Zillig, Anna-Lena, Pauli, Paul, Wieser, Matthias, Reicherts, Philipp
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: San Francisco Public Library of Science 07.11.2023; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Affect (Psychology); Arousal; Biology and Life Sciences; Care and treatment; Conditioning; Contingency; Cues; Emotion regulation; Evaluation; Experiments; Extinction; Extinction behavior; Heart rate; Heat; Learning; Medicine and Health Sciences; Pain; Pain perception; Perceptions; Questionnaires; Ratings; Ratings & rankings; Safety; Social Sciences; Temperature; Visual stimuli; Germany
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289047

The experience of threat was found to result—mostly—in increased pain, however it is still unclear whether the exact opposite, namely the feeling of safety may lead to a reduction of pain. To test this hypothesis, we conducted two between-subject experiments (N = 94; N = 87), investigating whether learned safety relative to a neutral control condition can reduce pain, while threat should lead to increased pain compared to a neutral condition. Therefore, participants first underwent either threat or safety conditioning, before entering an identical test phase, where the previously conditioned threat or safety cue and a newly introduced visual cue were presented simultaneously with heat pain stimuli. Methodological changes were performed in experiment 2 to prevent safety extinction and to facilitate conditioning in the first place: We included additional verbal instructions, increased the maximum length of the ISI and raised CS-US contingency in the threat group from 50% to 75%. In addition to pain ratings and ratings of the visual cues (threat, safety, arousal, valence, and contingency), in both experiments, we collected heart rate and skin conductance. Analysis of the cue ratings during acquisition indicate successful threat and safety induction, however results of the test phase, when also heat pain was administered, demonstrate rapid safety extinction in both experiments. Results suggest rather small modulation of subjective and physiological pain responses following threat or safety cues relative to the neutral condition. However, exploratory analysis revealed reduced pain ratings in later trials of the experiment in the safety group compared to the threat group in both studies, suggesting different temporal dynamics for threat and safety learning and extinction, respectively. Perspective : The present results demonstrate the challenge to maintain safety in the presence of acute pain and suggest more research on the interaction of affective learning mechanism and pain processing.