The effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase

• Published in: BMC musculoskeletal disorders Vol. 19; no. 1; p. 379
• Main Authors: Ishida, Tomoya, Koshino, Yuta, Yamanaka, Masanori, Ueno, Ryo, Taniguchi, Shohei, Samukawa, Mina, Saito, Hiroshi, Matsumoto, Hisashi, Aoki, Yoshimitsu, Tohyama, Harukazu
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 20.10.2018; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Adult; Analysis; Analysis of Variance; Anterior cruciate ligament; Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries - etiology; Athletes; Biomechanical Phenomena; Biomechanics; Female; Gender differences; Health aspects; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Jumping; Knee; Knee injury; Knee Joint - physiology; Ligaments; Male; Males; Movement - physiology; Musculoskeletal diseases; Neuromuscular system; Physiological aspects; Prevention; Prevention programs; Risk factor; Sex difference; Sex Factors; Sports injuries; Studies; Variance analysis; Young Adult; Biomechanics; Prevention; Knee injury; Sex difference; Anterior cruciate ligament; Risk factor
• ISSN: 1471-2474; 1471-2474
• DOI: 10.1186/s12891-018-2291-4

A double-leg landing with or without a subsequent jump is commonly used to evaluate the neuromuscular control of knee abduction. However, the differences in frontal plane knee biomechanics between landings with and without a subsequent jump are not well known. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of a subsequent jump on knee abduction, including during the early landing phase, in female and male subjects. Twenty-one female subjects and 21 male subjects participated. All subjects performed drop landing task (a landing without a subsequent jump) and drop vertical jump task (a landing with a subsequent jump). The subjects landed from a 30-cm height. In drop vertical jump, the subjects also performed a maximum vertical jump immediately after landing. The knee abduction angle and moment were analyzed using a 3D motion analysis system. A two-way analysis of variance (task × time) was performed to examine the effects of a subsequent jump on the knee abduction angle during the early landing phase in female and male subjects. Another two-way analysis of variance (task × sex) was performed to compare peak knee abduction angles and moments. In female subjects, the knee abduction angle was significantly greater during drop vertical jump than during drop landing, as measured 45 to 80 ms after initial contact (P < 0.05). Significant task-dependent effects in the peak knee abduction angle (P = 0.001) and the abduction moment (P = 0.029) were detected. The peak knee abduction angle and the abduction moment were greater during drop vertical jump than during drop landing. Subsequent jumps cause greater knee abduction during the early landing phase only in female subjects. This finding may relate to the sex discrepancy in non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Additionally, the presence of a subsequent jump significantly increases the peak knee abduction angle and the peak knee abduction moment during landings. Therefore, compared with a landing task without a subsequent jump (drop landing), a landing task with a subsequent jump (drop vertical jump) may be advantageous for screening for knee abduction control, especially in female athletes.