Vitamin D and SARS-CoV2 infection, severity and mortality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

To assess the evidence on SARS-CoV2 infection and Covid-19 in relation to deficiency and supplementation of vitamin D, we conducted a systematic review up to April 2021. We summarised data from 38 eligible studies, which presented risk estimates for at least one endpoint, including two RCT and 27 co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 17; no. 7; p. e0268396
Main Authors D'Ecclesiis, Oriana, Gavioli, Costanza, Martinoli, Chiara, Raimondi, Sara, Chiocca, Susanna, Miccolo, Claudia, Bossi, Paolo, Cortinovis, Diego, Chiaradonna, Ferdinando, Palorini, Roberta, Faciotti, Federica, Bellerba, Federica, Canova, Stefania, Jemos, Costantino, Salé, Emanuela Omodeo, Gaeta, Aurora, Zerbato, Barbara, Gnagnarella, Patrizia, Gandini, Sara
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published San Francisco Public Library of Science 06.07.2022
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:To assess the evidence on SARS-CoV2 infection and Covid-19 in relation to deficiency and supplementation of vitamin D, we conducted a systematic review up to April 2021. We summarised data from 38 eligible studies, which presented risk estimates for at least one endpoint, including two RCT and 27 cohort-studies: 205565 patients with information on 25OHD status and 2022 taking vitamin D supplementation with a total of 1197 admitted to the ICU or who needed invasive mechanical ventilation or intubation and hospital stay, and more than 910 Covid-19 deaths. Primary outcomes were severity and mortality and the main aim was to evaluate the association with vitamin D supplementation. Random effects models showed that supplementation was associated with a significant lower risk of both Covid-19 severe disease (SRR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20-0.72, 6 studies) and mortality (SRR 0.35, 95% CI 0.17-0.70, 8 studies). There were no statistically significant dose differences between studies: summary estimates with regular doses remain statistically significant, suggesting that higher doses are not necessary. For patients on vitamin D supplementation, a greater reduction in mortality risk emerged in older individuals and at higher latitudes. Regarding the quality of studies, assessed using the New Castle-Ottawa quality scale, the analysis revealed in most cases no statistically significant differences between low, medium or high quality studies. We found significant associations of vitamin D supplementation with Covid-19, encompassing risks of disease worsening and mortality, especially in seasons characterized by 25OHD deficiency and with not severe patients. Dedicated randomized clinical studies are encouraged to confirm these results.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Undefined-3
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
OD and CG are co-first authors on this work.
ISSN:1932-6203
1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0268396