Sex differences in impulsive action and impulsive choice

Here, we review the evidence for sex differences in behavioral measures of impulsivity for both humans and laboratory animals. We focus on two specific components of impulsivity: impulsive action (i.e., difficulty inhibiting a prepotent response) and impulsive choice (i.e., difficulty delaying grati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAddictive behaviors Vol. 39; no. 11; pp. 1573 - 1579
Main Authors Weafer, Jessica, de Wit, Harriet
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published England Elsevier Ltd 01.11.2014
Elsevier Science Ltd
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Here, we review the evidence for sex differences in behavioral measures of impulsivity for both humans and laboratory animals. We focus on two specific components of impulsivity: impulsive action (i.e., difficulty inhibiting a prepotent response) and impulsive choice (i.e., difficulty delaying gratification). Sex differences appear to exist on these measures, but the direction and magnitude of the differences vary. In laboratory animals, impulsive action is typically greater in males than females, whereas impulsive choice is typically greater in females. In humans, women discount more steeply than men, but sex differences on measures of impulsive action depend on tasks and subject samples. We discuss implications of these findings as they relate to drug addiction. We also point out the major gaps in this research to date, including the lack of studies designed specifically to examine sex differences in behavioral impulsivity, and the lack of consideration of menstrual or estrous phase or sex hormone levels in the studies. •In laboratory animals and humans, females tend to discount more steeply than males.•In laboratory animals, males tend to show greater impulsive action than females.•In humans, sex differences in impulsive action depend on tasks and subject samples.•Among heavy drinkers and smokers, women show greater impulsive action than men.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Review-3
content type line 23
ISSN:0306-4603
1873-6327
1873-6327
DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.10.033