Understanding and comparing the medical tourism cancer patient with the locally managed patient: A case control study

• Published in: PloS one Vol. 17; no. 9; p. e0273162
• Main Authors: Wangai, Mary W, Wangai, Frederick K, Njiri, Francis, Wangai, Enan N, Wangai, Paul, Nyongesa, Catherine, Kinuthia, John
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: San Francisco Public Library of Science 21.09.2022; Public Library of Science (PLoS)
• Subjects: Bivariate analysis; Cancer; Cancer patients; Cancer therapies; Care and treatment; Comparative analysis; Complications; Confidence intervals; Cost effectiveness; Data collection; Forecasts and trends; Gastrointestinal cancer; Health care; Health care policy; Health facilities; Health services; Hospitals; Industrialized nations; Medical referrals; Medical tourism; Medicine and Health Sciences; National health insurance; Patients; People and Places; Prostate cancer; Questionnaires; Regression analysis; Sensitizing; Sociodemographics; Statistical analysis; Tourism; Workloads; Kenya; United States > US; Texas
• ISSN: 1932-6203; 1932-6203
• DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273162

Medical tourism is characterized by people seeking treatment abroad for various medical conditions due to varied reasons, many of whom benefit from specialized care for non-communicable diseases. Conversely, there are associated negative effects such as medical complications and weakened health systems. Currently, there is paucity of scientific evidence on patient-related factors influencing seeking treatment benefits abroad. This study sought to compare patient-related factors associated with choice of cancer treatment center locally or abroad, to understand reasons for seeking treatment outside Kenya. As a case-control study, 254 cancer patients were randomly sampled to compare responses from those who chose to receive initial treatment abroad or in Kenya. The cases were recruited from Ministry of Health while the controls from Kenyatta National Hospital and Texas Cancer Center. Data was analyzed using SPSS Software Version 21. Descriptive statistics, bivariate and multiple logistic regression analysis was carried out. Level of significance was set at 5%. Out of 254 respondents, 174 (69.5%) were treated for cancer in Kenya and 80 (31.5%) in India. We found that cost effectiveness was a significant factor for over 73% of all respondents. The study revealed independent predictors for seeking treatment in India were: monthly income higher than US$ 250; every additional month from when disclosure to patients was done increased likelihood by 1.16 times; physician advice (Odds Ratio(OR) 66; 95% Confidence Interval(CI) 7.9-552.9); friends and family (OR 42; 95% CI 7.07-248.6); and perception of better quality of care (OR 22.5; 95% CI 2.2-230.6). Reasons patients with cancer sought treatment in India are multifactorial. Several of these can be addressed to reverse out-ward bound medical tourism and contribute to improving the in-country cancer healthcare. It will require strengthening the health system accordingly and sensitizing the medical fraternity and general public on the same.