Peripheral intravenous catheter insertion and use of ultrasound in patients with difficult intravenous access: Australian patient and practitioner perspectives to inform future implementation strategies
To understand healthcare worker and patient experience with peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion in patients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) including the use of ultrasound (US). Descriptive study using 1-on-1 semi-structured interviews conducted between August 2020 and January...
Saved in:
Published in | PloS one Vol. 17; no. 6; p. e0269788 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
San Francisco
Public Library of Science
24.06.2022
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | To understand healthcare worker and patient experience with peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion in patients with difficult intravenous access (DIVA) including the use of ultrasound (US). Descriptive study using 1-on-1 semi-structured interviews conducted between August 2020 and January 2021. Purposeful sampling was used to recruit healthcare practitioners (HCPs) and patients with DIVA who had PIVC experience. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Interview data were than mapped to the implementation theory Behaviour Change Wheel to inform implementation strategies. In total 78 interviews (13 patients; 65 HCPs) were completed with respondents from metropolitan (60%), regional (25%) and rural/remote (15%) settings across Australia. Thematic analysis revealed 4 major themes: i) Harmful patient experiences persist, with patient insights not leveraged to effect change; ii) 'Escalation' is just a word on the front lines; iii) Heightened risk of insertion failure without resources and training; and iv) Paving the way forward-'measures need to be in place to prevent failed insertion attempts. Themes were mapped to the behaviour change wheel and implementation strategies developed, these included: staff education, e-health record for DIVA identification, DIVA standard of care and DIVA guidelines to support escalation and ultrasound use. DIVA patients continue to have poor healthcare experiences with PIVC insertion. There is poor standardisation of DIVA assessment, escalation, US use and clinician education across hospitals. Quality, safety, and education improvement opportunities exist to improve the patient with DIVA experience and prevent traumatic insertions. We identified a number of implementation strategies to support future ultrasound and DIVA pathway implementation. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Competing Interests: I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Jessica Schults reports grants from Becton Dickinson unrelated to the current project. Claire Rickard: discloses that her current or previous employer has received on her behalf: investigator-initiated research grants from BD-Bard, Cardinal Health and Eloquest; and consultancy payments for lectures or opinion from 3M and BD-Bard; unrelated to current project. Nicole Marsh: reports that her affiliated universities have received on her behalf, speaker fees from 3M, investigator-initiated research grants from Becton Dickinson, Cardinal Health, Eloquest Healthcare and a consultancy payment from Becton Dickinson for clinical feedback related to peripheral intravenous catheter placement and maintenance (unrelated to the current project). Marie Cooke: discloses that her previous employer has received on her behalf: investigator-initiated research grants from BD-Bard unrelated to current project. PC, ES, RP, CB, MF, JK, GK, PS, JB, GK have no conflicts of interest to disclose. |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
DOI: | 10.1371/journal.pone.0269788 |