Wales Interventions and Cancer Knowledge about Early Diagnosis (WICKED): findings of work package 2 of the WICKED research programme

• Published in: British journal of general practice Vol. 68; no. suppl 1; p. bjgp18X697433
• Main Authors: Nafees, Sadia, Law, Rebecca-Jane, Hendry, Maggie, Hiscock, Julia, Stanciu, Marian A, Lewis, Ruth, Surgey, Alun, Goulden, Nia, Hoare, Zoe, Brain, Katherine, Smits, Stephanie, Yeo, Seow T, Edwards, Rhiannon Tudor, Williams, Lynne, Williams, Nefyn, Wilkinson, Clare, Neal, Richard D
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Royal College of General Practitioners 01.06.2018
• Subjects: Cancer; Family physicians; Intervention; Medical diagnosis; United Kingdom > UK
• ISSN: 0960-1643; 1478-5242
• DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X697433

Abstract only Background Cancer outcomes in the UK are worse than many countries with similar health structures. GPs play a pivotal role in improving cancer outcomes through earlier diagnosis. Aim To develop and evaluate a behavioural intervention to enable GPs to expedite cancer diagnosis. Method This ongoing programme is divided into four inter-related Work Packages (WPs) using a mixed methods approach. WP 2 comprises an all-Wales online GP questionnaire, 20 GP telephone interviews, and 4 practice-team focus groups. The questionnaire examined GPs’ perceptions and attitudes towards cancer diagnosis, and influences on cancer referral-related behaviour change. GPs’ individual beliefs and behaviours were explored in interviews; practice systems and norms were investigated in focus groups. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively, with conventional content analysis for free-text responses, and Framework analysis was used for qualitative data-sets. Results Early findings show that 269/1993 (13.5%) GPs completed the survey. Most agreed that ‘timelier diagnosis leads to better survival’, perceived themselves to be knowledgeable, confident and capable in managing cancer symptoms, reported recent changes in their cancer-related diagnostic activity, and believed in their ability to influence timely diagnosis. However, many thought that, if given the opportunity and support, there was still room to improve early cancer diagnosis. Preliminary analysis of six interviews revealed 5 themes including; ‘wanting referral behaviour to fit, ‘feeling untrusted by secondary care’, ‘practicing over-defensive medicine’, ‘support from colleagues, and ‘difficulty referring patients with vague symptoms’. Conclusion These findings will inform the development (WP3), and evaluation (WP4) of a behavioural intervention to expedite referral and diagnosis.