A genome-wide association study of seasonal pattern mania identifies NF1A as a possible susceptibility gene for bipolar disorder
Abstract Objective The use of subphenotypes may be an effective approach for genetic studies of complex diseases. Manic episodes with a seasonal pattern may distinguish phenotypic subgroups of bipolar subjects that may also differ genetically. Method We have performed a genome-wide association study...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of affective disorders Vol. 145; no. 2; pp. 200 - 207 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Oxford
Elsevier B.V
20.02.2013
Elsevier |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract Objective The use of subphenotypes may be an effective approach for genetic studies of complex diseases. Manic episodes with a seasonal pattern may distinguish phenotypic subgroups of bipolar subjects that may also differ genetically. Method We have performed a genome-wide association study using GAIN genotype data from the Bipolar Genome Study (BiGS) and bipolar subjects that were categorized as having either seasonal or non-seasonal patterned manic episodes. Results A bipolar case-only analysis identified three genomic regions that differed between seasonal and non-seasonal patterned manic episodes of bipolar subjects. The most significant association was for rs41350144, which lies within an intron of NF1A gene on 1p31 ( P =3.08×10−7 , OR=2.27). Haplotype construction using flanking three SNPs (rs41453448, rs1125777, and rs12568010) spanning 7549 bp showed a more significant association ( P =2.12×10−7 , OR=0.4). Conclusions These data suggest that genetic variants in the NF1A gene region may predispose to seasonal patterned of mania in bipolar disorder. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 H.J.L., H.G.W. and T.A.G. take responsibility for the association analyses and the general integrity of the data. J.R.K. and D.F.K. participated in particular aspects of study design. Members of the BiGS consortium were responsible for subject collection and genotyping. All authors were responsible for reviewing and approving the final manuscript. HJL and HGW equally contributed to the study. Contributors |
ISSN: | 0165-0327 1573-2517 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jad.2012.07.032 |