Electric Endocut and Autocut Resection for Endoscopic Papillectomy: A Systematic Review

Objective Risks of bleeding and pancreatitis after mucosal resection using the purecut/autocut and blendcut/endocut modes for endoscopic papillectomy have not been fully clarified. Thus, a systematic review on electrosurgical cutting modes for endoscopic papillectomy was conducted focusing on the ty...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternal Medicine Vol. 58; no. 19; pp. 2767 - 2772
Main Authors Minami, Kazuhiro, Iwasaki, Eisuke, Fukuhara, Seiichiro, Horibe, Masayasu, Seino, Takashi, Kawasaki, Shintaro, Katayama, Tadashi, Takimoto, Youichi, Tamagawa, Hiroki, Machida, Yujiro, Kanai, Takanori, Itoi, Takao
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine 01.10.2019
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective Risks of bleeding and pancreatitis after mucosal resection using the purecut/autocut and blendcut/endocut modes for endoscopic papillectomy have not been fully clarified. Thus, a systematic review on electrosurgical cutting modes for endoscopic papillectomy was conducted focusing on the types and incidence of adverse events. Methods We searched the PubMed and Cochrane library for cases of endoscopic papillectomy recorded as of April 2017. Studies reporting the methods of electrically excising a tumor in the duodenal papilla and the number of adverse events were extracted. Studies were collected and examined separately based on the electrosurgical cutting mode, and the incidence rate for each adverse event was summarized. Results A total of 159 relevant articles were found; among them, 20 studies were included and 139 excluded. Five studies analyzed endoscopic papillectomy with the purecut/autocut mode and 16 with the blendcut/endocut mode. Only one study investigated both modes (purecut and endocut). With the purecut/autocut mode, the incidence of bleeding was 2.8-50%, and that of pancreatitis was 0-50% (mean: 12.8%). With the blendcut/endocut mode, the incidence of bleeding was 0-42.3%, and that of pancreatitis was 0%-17.9% (mean: 9.5%). Conclusion Both methods had high adverse event rates for endoscopic papillectomy. Thus, a standard method of endoscopic papillectomy, including the electrosurgical cutting mode, needs to be established.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Undefined-1
ObjectType-Feature-3
content type line 23
Correspondence to Dr. Eisuke Iwasaki, iwaiwa2007@gmail.com
ISSN:0918-2918
1349-7235
DOI:10.2169/internalmedicine.2720-19