DNA variation in the acidic chitinase locus (ChiA) region in Arabis gemmifera and its related species

We analyzed DNA variation at the acidic chitinase (ChiA) locus of Arabis gemmifera and among its eight related species. Nucleotide diversity (p) of the entire locus in A. gemmifera was 0.0032, which was one third that of A. thaliana. In A. gemmifera, an excess of unique polymorphisms yielded signifi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGenes & Genetic Systems Vol. 77; no. 3; pp. 167 - 175
Main Authors Kawabe, A. (Kyoto Univ. (Japan)), Miyashita, N.T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Japan The Genetics Society of Japan 01.06.2002
Japan Science and Technology Agency
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We analyzed DNA variation at the acidic chitinase (ChiA) locus of Arabis gemmifera and among its eight related species. Nucleotide diversity (p) of the entire locus in A. gemmifera was 0.0032, which was one third that of A. thaliana. In A. gemmifera, an excess of unique polymorphisms yielded significantly negative results with the tests of Tajima and Fu and Li. The McDonald and Kreitman test revealed that the ratio of nucleotide replacement to synonymous changes in A. gemmifera was significantly greater than those between A. gemmifera and A. glabra, A. gemmifera and A. griffithiana, A. gemmifera and A. korshinskyi, A. gemmifera and A. wallichii, and A. gemmifera and A. himalaica. These results indicated that the neutrality assumption, the equilibrium population assumption, or both, could not be applied to the ChiA locus of A. gemmifera. The small size and relative isolation of local subpopulations of A. gemmifera could explain the excess of unique polymorphisms and the high proportion of replacement changes. The specific sampling scheme of this study, where one strain each was sampled from each local subpopulation might also have led to an excess of singletons. Interspecific comparison among Arabidopsis, Arabis and Cardaminopsis species showed that Ka was always lower than Ks, providing evidence against the adaptive evolution of ChiA. However, KalKs was greater between closely related species than between more distant related species. ChiA had a higher level of replacement divergence and a lower level of synonymous divergence compared than did Adh. We suggest that both the mutation rate at the nucleotide level and the selective constraints at the protein level are lower in ChiA than in Adh
Bibliography:F30
2002006420
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:1341-7568
1880-5779
DOI:10.1266/ggs.77.167