A scoping review of considerations and practices for benefit sharing in biobanking

• Published in: BMC medical ethics Vol. 22; no. 1; p. 102
• Main Authors: Sudoi, Allan, De Vries, Jantina, Kamuya, Dorcas
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 27.07.2021; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Benefit sharing; Benefits; Biobanking; Biobanks; Biological Specimen Banks; Biological specimens; Collections and collecting; Consent; Empirical Research; Ethical aspects; Ethics; Genetic research; Humans; Medical ethics; Medical research; Sample sharing; Africa; Ethics; Biobanking; Benefits; Biobanks; Sample sharing; Benefit sharing
• ISSN: 1472-6939; 1472-6939
• DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00671-x

Despite the rapid global growth of biobanking over the last few decades, and their potential for the advancement of health research, considerations specific to the sharing of benefits that accrue from biobanks have received little attention. Questions such as the types and range of benefits that can arise in biobanking, who should be entitled to those benefits, when they should be provided, by whom and in what form remain mostly unanswered. We conducted a scoping review to describe benefit sharing considerations and practices in biobanking in order to inform current and future policy and practice. Drawing on the Arksey and O'Malley framework, we conducted a scoping review of the literature in three online databases (PubMed, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar). We extracted and charted data to capture general characteristics, definitions and examples of benefits and benefit sharing, justification for benefit sharing, challenges in benefit sharing, governance mechanisms as well as proposed benefit sharing mechanisms. 29 articles published between 1999 and 2020 met the inclusion criteria for the study. The articles included 5 empirical and 24 non-empirical studies. Only 12 articles discussed benefit sharing as a stand-alone subject, while the remaining 17 integrated a discussion of benefits as one issue amongst others. Major benefit sharing challenges in biobanking were found to be those associated with uncertainties around the future use of samples and in resultant benefits. Most of the benefit sharing definitions and approaches currently in use for biobanking are similar to those used in health research. These approaches may not recognise the distinct features of biobanking, specifically relating to uncertainties associated with the sharing and re-use of samples. We therefore support approaches that allow decisions about benefit sharing to be made progressively once it is apparent who samples are to be shared with, the intended purpose and expected benefits. We also highlight gaps in key areas informing benefit sharing in biobanking and draw attention to the need for further empirical research.