National study of the impact of patient information and involvement in decision-making on immediate breast reconstruction rates

Background Reconstructive alternatives should be discussed with women facing mastectomy for breast cancer. These include immediate and delayed reconstruction, which both have inherent advantages and disadvantages. Immediate reconstruction rates vary considerably in Swedish healthcare regions, and th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inBritish journal of surgery Vol. 103; no. 12; pp. 1640 - 1648
Main Authors Frisell, A., Lagergren, J., de Boniface, J.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chichester, UK John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 01.11.2016
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background Reconstructive alternatives should be discussed with women facing mastectomy for breast cancer. These include immediate and delayed reconstruction, which both have inherent advantages and disadvantages. Immediate reconstruction rates vary considerably in Swedish healthcare regions, and the aim of the study was to analyse reasons for this disparity. Methods All women who underwent mastectomy for primary breast cancer in Sweden in 2013 were included. Tumour data were retrieved from the Swedish National Breast Cancer Registry and from questionnaires regarding patient information and involvement in preoperative decision‐making sent to women who were still alive in 2015. Results Of 2929 women who had undergone 2996 mastectomies, 2906 were still alive. The questionnaire response rate was 76·3 per cent. Immediate reconstruction rates varied regionally, between 3·0 and 26·4 per cent. Tumour characteristics impacted on reconstruction rates but did not explain regional differences. Patient participation in decision‐making, availability of plastic surgery services and patient information, however, were independent predictors of immediate breast reconstruction, and varied significantly between regions. Even in younger patients with low‐risk tumours, rates of patient information ranged between 34·3 and 83·3 per cent. Conclusion Significant regional differences in immediate reconstruction rates were not explained by differences in tumour characteristics, but by disparities in patient information, availability of plastic surgery services and involvement in decision‐making. Information is key
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-6829V345-N
istex:9F0FB3F69F15B07B01AEC5572D79DF2B4FCC3F6E
Fig. S1 Patient questionnaire Fig. S2 Surgeon questionnaire
Swedish Breast Cancer Association (BRO)
ArticleID:BJS10286
Swedish Society for Medical Research
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:0007-1323
1365-2168
1365-2168
DOI:10.1002/bjs.10286