National study of the impact of patient information and involvement in decision-making on immediate breast reconstruction rates
Background Reconstructive alternatives should be discussed with women facing mastectomy for breast cancer. These include immediate and delayed reconstruction, which both have inherent advantages and disadvantages. Immediate reconstruction rates vary considerably in Swedish healthcare regions, and th...
Saved in:
Published in | British journal of surgery Vol. 103; no. 12; pp. 1640 - 1648 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Chichester, UK
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
01.11.2016
Oxford University Press |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background
Reconstructive alternatives should be discussed with women facing mastectomy for breast cancer. These include immediate and delayed reconstruction, which both have inherent advantages and disadvantages. Immediate reconstruction rates vary considerably in Swedish healthcare regions, and the aim of the study was to analyse reasons for this disparity.
Methods
All women who underwent mastectomy for primary breast cancer in Sweden in 2013 were included. Tumour data were retrieved from the Swedish National Breast Cancer Registry and from questionnaires regarding patient information and involvement in preoperative decision‐making sent to women who were still alive in 2015.
Results
Of 2929 women who had undergone 2996 mastectomies, 2906 were still alive. The questionnaire response rate was 76·3 per cent. Immediate reconstruction rates varied regionally, between 3·0 and 26·4 per cent. Tumour characteristics impacted on reconstruction rates but did not explain regional differences. Patient participation in decision‐making, availability of plastic surgery services and patient information, however, were independent predictors of immediate breast reconstruction, and varied significantly between regions. Even in younger patients with low‐risk tumours, rates of patient information ranged between 34·3 and 83·3 per cent.
Conclusion
Significant regional differences in immediate reconstruction rates were not explained by differences in tumour characteristics, but by disparities in patient information, availability of plastic surgery services and involvement in decision‐making.
Information is key |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ark:/67375/WNG-6829V345-N istex:9F0FB3F69F15B07B01AEC5572D79DF2B4FCC3F6E Fig. S1 Patient questionnaire Fig. S2 Surgeon questionnaire Swedish Breast Cancer Association (BRO) ArticleID:BJS10286 Swedish Society for Medical Research ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0007-1323 1365-2168 1365-2168 |
DOI: | 10.1002/bjs.10286 |