Daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: extended follow-up of POLLUX, a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study

In POLLUX, daratumumab (D) plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd) reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 63% and increased the overall response rate (ORR) versus Rd in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Updated efficacy and safety after >3 years of follow-up are presented. Pa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inLeukemia Vol. 34; no. 7; pp. 1875 - 1884
Main Authors Bahlis, Nizar J., Dimopoulos, Meletios A., White, Darrell J., Benboubker, Lotfi, Cook, Gordon, Leiba, Merav, Ho, P. Joy, Kim, Kihyun, Takezako, Naoki, Moreau, Philippe, Kaufman, Jonathan L., Krevvata, Maria, Chiu, Christopher, Qin, Xiang, Okonkwo, Linda, Trivedi, Sonali, Ukropec, Jon, Qi, Ming, San-Miguel, Jesus
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.07.2020
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In POLLUX, daratumumab (D) plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd) reduced the risk of disease progression or death by 63% and increased the overall response rate (ORR) versus Rd in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Updated efficacy and safety after >3 years of follow-up are presented. Patients ( N  = 569) with ≥1 prior line received Rd (lenalidomide, 25 mg, on Days 1–21 of each 28-day cycle; dexamethasone, 40 mg, weekly) ± daratumumab at the approved dosing schedule. Minimal residual disease (MRD) was assessed by next-generation sequencing. After 44.3 months median follow-up, D-Rd prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) in the intent-to-treat population (median 44.5 vs 17.5 months; HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.35–0.55; P  < 0.0001) and in patient subgroups. D-Rd demonstrated higher ORR (92.9 vs 76.4%; P  < 0.0001) and deeper responses, including complete response or better (56.6 vs 23.2%; P  < 0.0001) and MRD negativity (10 –5 ; 30.4 vs 5.3%; P  < 0.0001). Median time to next therapy was prolonged with D-Rd (50.6 vs 23.1 months; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.31–0.50; P  < 0.0001). Median PFS on subsequent line of therapy (PFS2) was not reached with D-Rd versus 31.7 months with Rd (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42–0.68; P  < 0.0001). No new safety concerns were reported. These data support using D-Rd in patients with RRMM after first relapse.
ISSN:0887-6924
1476-5551
DOI:10.1038/s41375-020-0711-6