Rapid mass spectrometric conversion of tissue biopsy samples into permanent quantitative digital proteome maps
A method for converting biopsy-size tissue samples into digital files containing the mass spectrometry–measurable proteome of the sample will allow analysis and re-analysis of limited tissue samples. Clinical specimens are each inherently unique, limited and nonrenewable. Small samples such as tissu...
Saved in:
Published in | Nature medicine Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 407 - 413 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
New York
Nature Publishing Group US
01.04.2015
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | A method for converting biopsy-size tissue samples into digital files containing the mass spectrometry–measurable proteome of the sample will allow analysis and re-analysis of limited tissue samples.
Clinical specimens are each inherently unique, limited and nonrenewable. Small samples such as tissue biopsies are often completely consumed after a limited number of analyses. Here we present a method that enables fast and reproducible conversion of a small amount of tissue (approximating the quantity obtained by a biopsy) into a single, permanent digital file representing the mass spectrometry (MS)-measurable proteome of the sample. The method combines pressure cycling technology (PCT) and sequential window acquisition of all theoretical fragment ion spectra (SWATH)-MS. The resulting proteome maps can be analyzed, re-analyzed, compared and mined
in silico
to detect and quantify specific proteins across multiple samples. We used this method to process and convert 18 biopsy samples from nine patients with renal cell carcinoma into SWATH-MS fragment ion maps. From these proteome maps we detected and quantified more than 2,000 proteins with a high degree of reproducibility across all samples. The measured proteins clearly distinguished tumorous kidney tissues from healthy tissues and differentiated distinct histomorphological kidney cancer subtypes. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 Author contributions R.A. conceived the idea. T.G. developed the method. S.G., M.J., W.J designed the clinical cohort and collected the clinical tissue samples. T.G., P.K. and C.C.K. performed the analysis of the tissues. L.C.G. and T.G. performed the MS measurements. T.G. performed the data analysis, with critical inputs from W.W. C.C.K., H.R., G.R., B.C.C. and L.B.. T.G. and R.A. wrote the manuscript. C.C.K., M.J. and all the other authors contributed to the revision of the manuscript. R.A. supervised the project. Current address: Turku Centre for Biotechnology, University of Turku and Åbo Akademi University, Finland |
ISSN: | 1078-8956 1546-170X |
DOI: | 10.1038/nm.3807 |