A Comparative Review of Prevention of Rabies Incursion between Japan and Other Rabies-Free Countries or Regions
Although rabies still kills many people, the global eradication of human rabies is considered to be feasible. Progress towards eradication may differ among regions with differing socio-economic statuses; therefore, states that successfully eradicate this disease must be vigilant for rabies re-emerge...
Saved in:
Published in | Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases Vol. 72; no. 4; pp. 203 - 210 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Japan
National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases Editorial Committee
2019
Japan Science and Technology Agency |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Although rabies still kills many people, the global eradication of human rabies is considered to be feasible. Progress towards eradication may differ among regions with differing socio-economic statuses; therefore, states that successfully eradicate this disease must be vigilant for rabies re-emergence. Here, we discuss challenges that remain concerning current rabies prevention measures and risk assessment results concerning possible rabies introduction and spread in rabies-free Japan. We summarize the preventative measures undertaken by representative rabies-free countries and regions. Our risk assessment results show that the risk of rabies reintroduction under current circumstances is very low, and that subsequent spread of the disease would be minimal because of quite low value of basic reproduction number. Similar assessments conducted in other rabies-free areas also showed limited risks of introduction. The majority of rabies-free countries maintain their rabies-free status through strict import quarantine of carnivorous animals, efficient surveillance of animal rabies including wildlife, quick emergency responses, and raising public awareness of the disease. To maintain the current rabies-free status in Japan, we strongly recommend maintaining the current quarantine system and reinforcing stakeholder compliance for those involved in international movement of dogs. Moreover, sustainable surveillance systems targeting wildlife are indispensable. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-2 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-3 content type line 23 ObjectType-Review-1 |
ISSN: | 1344-6304 1884-2836 |
DOI: | 10.7883/yoken.JJID.2018.431 |