Interventions designed to reduce implicit prejudices and implicit stereotypes in real world contexts: a systematic review

• Published in: BMC Psychology Vol. 7; no. 1; pp. 29 - 12
• Main Authors: FitzGerald, Chloë, Martin, Angela, Berner, Delphine, Hurst, Samia
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: England BioMed Central Ltd 16.05.2019; BioMed Central; BMC
• Subjects: Associations; Bias; Discrimination; Ethics; Implicit bias; Implicit prejudice; Implicit stereotype; Interventions; Meta-analysis; Prejudice; Professionals; Psychologists; Psychology; Race; Racism; Stereotypes; Stereotypes (Psychology); Systematic review; Training; Unconscious bias; Implicit stereotype; Training; Implicit prejudice; Unconscious bias; Interventions; Implicit bias; Professional ethics
• ISSN: 2050-7283; 2050-7283
• DOI: 10.1186/s40359-019-0299-7

Implicit biases are present in the general population and among professionals in various domains, where they can lead to discrimination. Many interventions are used to reduce implicit bias. However, uncertainties remain as to their effectiveness. We conducted a systematic review by searching ERIC, PUBMED and PSYCHINFO for peer-reviewed studies conducted on adults between May 2005 and April 2015, testing interventions designed to reduce implicit bias, with results measured using the Implicit Association Test (IAT) or sufficiently similar methods. 30 articles were identified as eligible. Some techniques, such as engaging with others' perspective, appear unfruitful, at least in short term implicit bias reduction, while other techniques, such as exposure to counterstereotypical exemplars, are more promising. Robust data is lacking for many of these interventions. Caution is thus advised when it comes to programs aiming at reducing biases. This does not weaken the case for implementing widespread structural and institutional changes that are multiply justified.