Ideology, Power, and Equity: Testing Competing Explanations for the Perception of Fairness in Household Labor

Previous explanations of couples' tendency to see their household division of labor as fair primarily support the influence of three factors, net of partners' actual contributions to "female-typed" housework. The three are partners' adherence to a traditional gender role ide...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inSocial forces Vol. 74; no. 3; pp. 1043 - 1071
Main Authors DeMaris, Alfred, Longmore, Monica A.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Chapel Hill, NC The University of North Carolina Press 01.03.1996
University of North Carolina Press
Oxford University Press
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Previous explanations of couples' tendency to see their household division of labor as fair primarily support the influence of three factors, net of partners' actual contributions to "female-typed" housework. The three are partners' adherence to a traditional gender role ideology, wives' limited alternatives to the marriage, and equity across key domains of the relationship. Using responses from 2,109 male and 2,096 female marital partners from the National Survey of Families and Households 1987-88, we examine the relative efficacy of these factors in accounting for variation in the perception that housework is unfair to the wife. We find most support for the effect of ideology and considerations of equity and relatively little for wives' alternatives, at least when the latter are measured by wives' general human capital. The findings suggest ways in which partners' negotiations are constrained by gender role beliefs.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/HXZ-TK524Q58-K
Address all correspondence to Alfred DeMaris, Department of Sociology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403.
istex:67DEB116BEE3570B2B9E45ED9AED062733F975A4
ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
ISSN:0037-7732
1534-7605
DOI:10.1093/sf/74.3.1043