Infection fatality rate of SARS-CoV2 in a super-spreading event in Germany

A SARS-CoV2 super-spreading event occurred during carnival in a small town in Germany. Due to the rapidly imposed lockdown and its relatively closed community, this town was seen as an ideal model to investigate the infection fatality rate (IFR). Here, a 7-day seroepidemiological observational study...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inNature communications Vol. 11; no. 1; p. 5829
Main Authors Streeck, Hendrik, Schulte, Bianca, Kümmerer, Beate M., Richter, Enrico, Höller, Tobias, Fuhrmann, Christine, Bartok, Eva, Dolscheid-Pommerich, Ramona, Berger, Moritz, Wessendorf, Lukas, Eschbach-Bludau, Monika, Kellings, Angelika, Schwaiger, Astrid, Coenen, Martin, Hoffmann, Per, Stoffel-Wagner, Birgit, Nöthen, Markus M., Eis-Hübinger, Anna M., Exner, Martin, Schmithausen, Ricarda Maria, Schmid, Matthias, Hartmann, Gunther
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 17.11.2020
Nature Publishing Group
Nature Portfolio
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:A SARS-CoV2 super-spreading event occurred during carnival in a small town in Germany. Due to the rapidly imposed lockdown and its relatively closed community, this town was seen as an ideal model to investigate the infection fatality rate (IFR). Here, a 7-day seroepidemiological observational study was performed to collect information and biomaterials from a random, household-based study population. The number of infections was determined by IgG analyses and PCR testing. We found that of the 919 individuals with evaluable infection status, 15.5% (95% CI:[12.3%; 19.0%]) were infected. This is a fivefold higher rate than the reported cases for this community (3.1%). 22.2% of all infected individuals were asymptomatic. The estimated IFR was 0.36% (95% CI:[0.29%; 0.45%]) for the community and 0.35% [0.28%; 0.45%] when age-standardized to the population of the community. Participation in carnival increased both infection rate (21.3% versus 9.5%, p  < 0.001) and number of symptoms (estimated relative mean increase 1.6, p  = 0.007). While the infection rate here is not representative for Germany, the IFR is useful to estimate the consequences of the pandemic in places with similar healthcare systems and population characteristics. Whether the super-spreading event not only increases the infection rate but also affects the IFR requires further investigation. Here the authors present a SARS-CoV2 seroepidemiological observational study from a random, household-based study population in a small town in Germany, showing the effect of a super-spreading event on infection rate, severity, and potentially infection fatality rate.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
ISSN:2041-1723
2041-1723
DOI:10.1038/s41467-020-19509-y