Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict

We report a series of experiments carried out with Palestinian and Israeli participants showing that violent opposition to compromise over issues considered sacred is (i) increased by offering material incentives to compromise but (ii) decreased when the adversary makes symbolic compromises over the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 104; no. 18; pp. 7357 - 7360
Main Authors Ginges, Jeremy, Atran, Scott, Medin, Douglas, Shikaki, Khalil
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 01.05.2007
National Acad Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:We report a series of experiments carried out with Palestinian and Israeli participants showing that violent opposition to compromise over issues considered sacred is (i) increased by offering material incentives to compromise but (ii) decreased when the adversary makes symbolic compromises over their own sacred values. These results demonstrate some of the unique properties of reasoning and decision-making over sacred values. We show that the use of material incentives to promote the peaceful resolution of political and cultural conflicts may backfire when adversaries treat contested issues as sacred values.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 23
Contributed by Douglas Medin, March 1, 2007
Author contributions: J.G., S.A., D.M., and K.S. designed research; J.G. and K.S. performed research; J.G., S.A., D.M., and K.S. analyzed data; and J.G., S.A., D.M., and K.S. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.0701768104