Computational postprocessing quantification of small bowel motility using magnetic resonance images in clinical practice: An initial experience

Purpose To study the feasibility and to gauge the potential clinical impact of quantifying small bowel motility using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a larger population with a spectra of gastrointestinal conditions with impaired small bowel motility. Materials and Methods Data were gathered ret...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of magnetic resonance imaging Vol. 44; no. 2; pp. 277 - 287
Main Authors Åkerman, André, Månsson, Sven, Fork, Frans-Thomas, Leander, Peter, Ekberg, Olle, Taylor, Stuart, Menys, Alex, Ohlsson, Bodil
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States Blackwell Publishing Ltd 01.08.2016
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1053-1807
1522-2586
1522-2586
DOI10.1002/jmri.25166

Cover

More Information
Summary:Purpose To study the feasibility and to gauge the potential clinical impact of quantifying small bowel motility using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a larger population with a spectra of gastrointestinal conditions with impaired small bowel motility. Materials and Methods Data were gathered retrospectively from a cohort of 127 patients undergoing MR enterography (1.5 Tesla) in 2011. Cine motility sequences were processed with validated motility analysis software and a parametric motility map was generated. Regions of interests were drawn in the jejunum, ileum, and terminal ileum, and Jacobian standard deviation mean motility index' score (MIS) was calculated. Patients were divided into Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis, irritable bowel syndrome, and healthy subjects. Results In CD, terminal ileum motility was lower in comparison to healthy subjects (mean difference: ‐0.1052 arbitrary units, 95% confidence interval: ‐0.1981–‐0.0122, P = 0.018). Subgrouping of CD showed that the difference was recognized in patients with disease limited to the small bowel (mean difference: ‐0.1440 arbitrary units, 95% confidence interval: −0.2491–‐0.0389, P = 0.002). Visible dysmotility of terminal ileum on MRI reflected a reduced MIS compared with normal motility (0.22 ± 0.09 and 0.33 ± 0.15 arbitrary units, respectively, P = 0.043). Motility correlated negatively between ileum and age (P = 0.021), and between terminal ileum and C‐reactive protein in ulcerative colitis (P = 0.031). Conclusion Motility quantitation revealed a significant difference in motility of terminal ileum in patients with small bowel CD compared with healthy subjects, concording with visible dysmotility and inflammatory changes. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:277–287.
Bibliography:ark:/67375/WNG-NKFX43PS-L
Development Foundation of Region Skåne
istex:338B4F4F4F691CE035F793FC9F4DE999B6E789F7
ArticleID:JMRI25166
Dir Albert Påhlsson's Foundation.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.25166