Temporal subtraction CT with nonrigid image registration improves detection of bone metastases by radiologists: results of a large-scale observer study

• Published in: Scientific reports Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 18422 - 12
• Main Authors: Onoue, Koji, Yakami, Masahiro, Nishio, Mizuho, Sakamoto, Ryo, Aoyama, Gakuto, Nakagomi, Keita, Iizuka, Yoshio, Kubo, Takeshi, Emoto, Yutaka, Akasaka, Thai, Satoh, Kiyohide, Yamamoto, Hiroyuki, Isoda, Hiroyoshi, Togashi, Kaori
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: London Nature Publishing Group UK 16.09.2021; Nature Publishing Group; Nature Portfolio
• Subjects: 631/67/2321; 639/705/794; 639/766/930/2735; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bone Neoplasms - drug therapy; Bone Neoplasms - secondary; Female; Humanities and Social Sciences; Humans; Male; Malignancy; Metastases; Metastasis; Middle Aged; multidisciplinary; Observer Variation; Radiologists - statistics & numerical data; Science; Science (multidisciplinary); Sensitivity and Specificity; Software; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - standards
• ISSN: 2045-2322; 2045-2322
• DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-97607-7

To determine whether temporal subtraction (TS) CT obtained with non-rigid image registration improves detection of various bone metastases during serial clinical follow-up examinations by numerous radiologists. Six board-certified radiologists retrospectively scrutinized CT images for patients with history of malignancy sequentially. These radiologists selected 50 positive and 50 negative subjects with and without bone metastases, respectively. Furthermore, for each subject, they selected a pair of previous and current CT images satisfying predefined criteria by consensus. Previous images were non-rigidly transformed to match current images and subtracted from current images to automatically generate TS images. Subsequently, 18 radiologists independently interpreted the 100 CT image pairs to identify bone metastases, both without and with TS images, with each interpretation separated from the other by an interval of at least 30 days. Jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristics (JAFROC) analysis was conducted to assess observer performance. Compared with interpretation without TS images, interpretation with TS images was associated with a significantly higher mean figure of merit (0.710 vs. 0.658; JAFROC analysis, P = 0.0027). Mean sensitivity at lesion-based was significantly higher for interpretation with TS compared with that without TS (46.1% vs. 33.9%; P = 0.003). Mean false positive count per subject was also significantly higher for interpretation with TS than for that without TS (0.28 vs. 0.15; P < 0.001). At the subject-based, mean sensitivity was significantly higher for interpretation with TS images than that without TS images (73.2% vs. 65.4%; P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in mean specificity (0.93 vs. 0.95; P = 0.083). TS significantly improved overall performance in the detection of various bone metastases.