Impact of body-composition methodology on the composition of weight loss and weight gain
Background/Objectives: We intended to (i) to compare the composition of weight loss and weight gain using densitometry, deuterium dilution (D 2 O), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the four-compartment (4C) model and (ii) to compare regional changes in fat...
Saved in:
Published in | European journal of clinical nutrition Vol. 67; no. 5; pp. 446 - 454 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
01.05.2013
Nature Publishing Group |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background/Objectives:
We intended to (i) to compare the composition of weight loss and weight gain using densitometry, deuterium dilution (D
2
O), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the four-compartment (4C) model and (ii) to compare regional changes in fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM) and skeletal muscle as assessed by DXA and MRI.
Subjects/Methods:
Eighty-three study participants aged between 21 and 58 years with a body mass index range of 20.2–46.8 kg/m
2
had been assessed at two different occasions with a mean follow-up between 23.5 and 43.5 months. Body-weight changes within < 3% were considered as weight stable, a gain or a loss of >3% of initial weight was considered as a significant weight change.
Results:
There was a considerable bias between the body-composition data obtained by the individual methods. When compared with the 4C model, mean bias of D
2
O and densitometry was explained by the erroneous assumption of a constant hydration of FFM, thus, changes in FM were underestimated by D
2
O but overestimated by densitometry. Because hydration does not normalize after weight loss, all two-component models have a systematic error in weight-reduced subjects. The bias between 4C model and DXA was mainly explained by FM% at baseline, whereas FFM hydration contributed to additional 5%. As to the regional changes in body composition, DXA data had a considerable bias and, thus, cannot replace MRI.
Conclusions:
To assess changes in body composition associated with weight changes, only the 4C model and MRI can be used with confidence. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 14 ObjectType-Article-2 ObjectType-Feature-1 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 0954-3007 1476-5640 1476-5640 |
DOI: | 10.1038/ejcn.2013.35 |