Impact of body-composition methodology on the composition of weight loss and weight gain

Background/Objectives: We intended to (i) to compare the composition of weight loss and weight gain using densitometry, deuterium dilution (D 2 O), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the four-compartment (4C) model and (ii) to compare regional changes in fat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean journal of clinical nutrition Vol. 67; no. 5; pp. 446 - 454
Main Authors Pourhassan, M, Schautz, B, Braun, W, Gluer, C-C, Bosy-Westphal, A, Müller, M J
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Nature Publishing Group UK 01.05.2013
Nature Publishing Group
Subjects
O
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background/Objectives: We intended to (i) to compare the composition of weight loss and weight gain using densitometry, deuterium dilution (D 2 O), dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the four-compartment (4C) model and (ii) to compare regional changes in fat mass (FM), fat-free mass (FFM) and skeletal muscle as assessed by DXA and MRI. Subjects/Methods: Eighty-three study participants aged between 21 and 58 years with a body mass index range of 20.2–46.8 kg/m 2 had been assessed at two different occasions with a mean follow-up between 23.5 and 43.5 months. Body-weight changes within < 3% were considered as weight stable, a gain or a loss of >3% of initial weight was considered as a significant weight change. Results: There was a considerable bias between the body-composition data obtained by the individual methods. When compared with the 4C model, mean bias of D 2 O and densitometry was explained by the erroneous assumption of a constant hydration of FFM, thus, changes in FM were underestimated by D 2 O but overestimated by densitometry. Because hydration does not normalize after weight loss, all two-component models have a systematic error in weight-reduced subjects. The bias between 4C model and DXA was mainly explained by FM% at baseline, whereas FFM hydration contributed to additional 5%. As to the regional changes in body composition, DXA data had a considerable bias and, thus, cannot replace MRI. Conclusions: To assess changes in body composition associated with weight changes, only the 4C model and MRI can be used with confidence.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0954-3007
1476-5640
1476-5640
DOI:10.1038/ejcn.2013.35