Dynamic changes in paternal X-chromosome activity during imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice

In mammals, X-chromosome dosage compensation is achieved by inactivating one of the two X chromosomes in females. In mice, X inactivation is initially imprinted, with inactivation of the paternal X (Xp) chromosome occurring during preimplantation development. One theory is that the Xp is preinactiva...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS Vol. 106; no. 13; pp. 5198 - 5203
Main Authors Patrat, Catherine, Okamoto, Ikuhiro, Diabangouaya, Patricia, Vialon, Vivian, Le Baccon, Patricia, Chow, Jennifer, Heard, Edith
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published United States National Academy of Sciences 31.03.2009
National Acad Sciences
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In mammals, X-chromosome dosage compensation is achieved by inactivating one of the two X chromosomes in females. In mice, X inactivation is initially imprinted, with inactivation of the paternal X (Xp) chromosome occurring during preimplantation development. One theory is that the Xp is preinactivated in female embryos, because of its previous silence during meiosis in the male germ line. The extent to which the Xp is active after fertilization and the exact time of onset of X-linked gene silencing have been the subject of debate. We performed a systematic, single-cell transcriptional analysis to examine the activity of the Xp chromosome for a panel of X-linked genes throughout early preimplantation development in the mouse. Rather than being preinactivated, we found the Xp to be fully active at the time of zygotic gene activation, with silencing beginning from the 4-cell stage onward. X-inactivation patterns were, however, surprisingly diverse between genes. Some loci showed early onset (4-8-cell stage) of X inactivation, and some showed extremely late onset (postblastocyst stage), whereas others were never fully inactivated. Thus, we show that silencing of some X-chromosomal regions occurs outside of the usual time window and that escape from X inactivation can be highly lineage specific. These results reveal that imprinted X inactivation in mice is far less concerted than previously thought and highlight the epigenetic diversity underlying the dosage compensation process during early mammalian development.
Bibliography:SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 14
ObjectType-Article-2
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
Edited by Mary F. Lyon, Medical Research Council, Didcot, Oxon, United Kingdom, and approved January 22, 2009
Author contributions: C.P., I.O., and E.H. designed research; C.P., I.O., and P.D. performed research; J.C. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; C.P., I.O., V.V., and P.L.B. analyzed data; and C.P., I.O., and E.H. wrote the paper.
ISSN:0027-8424
1091-6490
1091-6490
DOI:10.1073/pnas.0810683106