Efficiency analysis of German electricity distribution utilities - non-parametric and parametric tests

This study applies non-parametric and parametric tests to assess the efficiency of electricity distribution companies in Germany. Traditional issues in electricity sector benchmarking are addressed, such as the role of scale effects and optimal utility size, as well as new evidence specific to the s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied economics Vol. 38; no. 21; pp. 2553 - 2566
Main Authors von Hirschhausen, Christian, Cullmann, Astrid, Kappeler, Andreas
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published London Routledge 10.12.2006
Taylor and Francis Journals
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Taylor & Francis (Routledge)
SeriesApplied Economics
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This study applies non-parametric and parametric tests to assess the efficiency of electricity distribution companies in Germany. Traditional issues in electricity sector benchmarking are addressed, such as the role of scale effects and optimal utility size, as well as new evidence specific to the situation in Germany. Labour, capital, and peak load capacity are used as inputs, and units sold and the number of customers as output. The data cover 307 (out of 553) German electricity distribution utilities. A data envelopment analysis (DEA) is applied with constant returns to scale (CRS) as the main productivity analysis technique, whereas stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) with distance function is the verification method. The results suggest that returns to scale play but a minor role; only very small utilities have a significant cost advantage. Low customer density is found to affect the efficiency score significantly, in particular in the lower third of all observations. Surprisingly, East German utilities feature a higher average efficiency than their West German counterparts. The correlation tests imply a high coherence of the results.
Bibliography:ObjectType-Article-2
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-1
content type line 23
ISSN:0003-6846
1466-4283
DOI:10.1080/00036840500427650