A practical guide for mutational signature analysis in hematological malignancies
Analysis of mutational signatures is becoming routine in cancer genomics, with implications for pathogenesis, classification, prognosis, and even treatment decisions. However, the field lacks a consensus on analysis and result interpretation. Using whole-genome sequencing of multiple myeloma (MM), c...
Saved in:
Published in | Nature communications Vol. 10; no. 1; pp. 2969 - 12 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article Publication |
Language | English |
Published |
London
Nature Publishing Group UK
05.07.2019
Nature Publishing Group Nature Research Nature Portfolio |
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Analysis of mutational signatures is becoming routine in cancer genomics, with implications for pathogenesis, classification, prognosis, and even treatment decisions. However, the field lacks a consensus on analysis and result interpretation. Using whole-genome sequencing of multiple myeloma (MM), chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and acute myeloid leukemia, we compare the performance of public signature analysis tools. We describe caveats and pitfalls of de novo signature extraction and fitting approaches, reporting on common inaccuracies: erroneous signature assignment, identification of localized hyper-mutational processes, overcalling of signatures. We provide reproducible solutions to solve these issues and use orthogonal approaches to validate our results. We show how a comprehensive mutational signature analysis may provide relevant biological insights, reporting evidence of c-AID activity among unmutated CLL cases or the absence of BRCA1/BRCA2-mediated homologous recombination deficiency in a MM cohort. Finally, we propose a general analysis framework to ensure production of accurate and reproducible mutational signature data.
Mutational signature analysis provides important information about the mutational processes underpinning different stages of tumorigenesis. Here, the authors compare publicly available signature extraction tools and suggest a framework for the generation of accurate and reproducible signature data. |
---|---|
Bibliography: | ObjectType-Article-1 SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1 ObjectType-Feature-2 content type line 23 |
ISSN: | 2041-1723 2041-1723 |
DOI: | 10.1038/s41467-019-11037-8 |