Vulnerability of biodiversity hotspots to global change

AIM: Global changes are predicted to have severe consequences for biodiversity; 34 biodiversity hotspots have become international priorities for conservation, with important efforts allocated to their preservation, but the potential effects of global changes on hotspots have so far received relativ...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inGlobal ecology and biogeography Vol. 23; no. 12; pp. 1376 - 1386
Main Authors Bellard, Céline, Leclerc, Camille, Leroy, Boris, Bakkenes, Michel, Veloz, Samuel, Thuiller, Wilfried, Courchamp, Franck
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Oxford Blackwell Science 01.12.2014
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Blackwell
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Wiley
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:AIM: Global changes are predicted to have severe consequences for biodiversity; 34 biodiversity hotspots have become international priorities for conservation, with important efforts allocated to their preservation, but the potential effects of global changes on hotspots have so far received relatively little attention. We investigate whether hotspots are quantitatively and qualitatively threatened to the same order of magnitude by the combined effects of global changes. LOCATION: Worldwide, in 34 biodiversity hotspots. METHODS: We quantify (1) the exposure of hotspots to climate change, by estimating the novelty of future climates and the disappearance of extant climates using climate dissimilarity analyses, (2) each hotspot's vulnerability to land modification and degradation by quantifying changes in land‐cover variables over the entire habitat, and (3) the future suitability of distribution ranges of ‘100 of the world's worst invasive alien species’, by characterizing the combined effects of climate and land‐use changes on the future distribution ranges of these species. RESULTS: Our findings show that hotspots may experience an average loss of 31% of their area under analogue climate, with some hotspots more affected than others (e.g. Polynesia–Micronesia). The greatest climate change was projected in low‐latitude hotspots. The hotspots were on average suitable for 17% of the considered invasive species. Hotspots that are mainly islands or groups of islands were disproportionally suitable for a high number of invasive species both currently and in the future. We also showed that hotspots will increase their area of pasture in the future. Finally, combining the three threats, we identified the Atlantic forest, Cape Floristic Region and Polynesia–Micronesia as particularly vulnerable to global changes. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: Given our estimates of hotspot vulnerability to changes, close monitoring is now required to evaluate the biodiversity responses to future changes and to test our projections against observations.
Bibliography:http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geb.12228
istex:E07DB1F4D03EB3CFEC7B46DD6CD814C41607966F
ArticleID:GEB12228
CNRS
Biodiversa Eranet FFII Project
Figure S1 Methodological choice of the threshold. Figure S2 Geographical distance (km) to the closest analogue climatic conditions between the current and future periods for the 21 continental hotspots for (a) the A1B emission scenario and (b) the B2A scenario. Figure S3 Boxplots of TSS and ROC values for the ensemble forecast projected model. Figure S4 Number of invasive alien species per pixel in the 34 hotspots compared to the rest of the world, for both current and future periods (A) A1 scenario on the left (B) B2 scenario on the right. Figure S5 Combined occurrences of 99 of 'the world's worst invasive species' across the world. Table S1 Number of endemic species in each of 34 biodiversity hotspots. Table S2 Environmental variables. Table S3 List of the 99 of 'the world's worst invasive species' with data sources and number of occurrences that were checked for each species. Table S4 Standardized Euclidian distance thresholds (SEDt) calculated for each hotspot. Table S5 Threatened endemic biodiversity due to climate change. Table S6 Kolmogorov-Smirnov test results comparing the distributions of number of endemic species affected by climate changes for each value of z. Table S7 Table of the rank for the 34 different hotspots according to number of endemic plant species for each hotspot (end.), the proportion of area protected by IUCN classification (I to IV) (PA), the percentage of climate loss (LCC), the potential number of invasive alien species in the future (IAS) and the percentage of future artificial land (LU) under A1B emission scenario. Supplementary text S1 Methodological details about species distribution models.
French Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)
European Research Council under the European Community's Seven Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013 - No. 281422
Service du Patrimoine Naturel
ark:/67375/WNG-SZJ71Z8Q-R
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ISSN:1466-822X
1466-8238
1466-822X
DOI:10.1111/geb.12228