阿卡波糖联合胰岛素治疗1型糖尿病的系统评价

目的:系统评价阿卡波糖联合胰岛素治疗1型糖尿病的有效性和安全性。方法:计算机检索Pubmed、Cochrane Library、中国生物医学文献数据库、维普数据库及中国知网数据库,筛选阿卡波糖联合胰岛素治疗1型糖尿病随机对照试验,采用Rev Man 5.2软件对纳入文献进行荟萃(Meta)分析。结果:共纳入4个随机对照试验,Meta分析结果显示,阿卡波糖组与安慰剂组在降低糖化血红蛋白水平方面的差异无统计学意义(SMD=-0.45,95%CI=-0.98~0.01,P=0.06);2组患者胰岛素用量的差异有统计学意义(SMD=-0.34,95%CI=-0.52~-0.15,P=0.000 3);...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in中国医院用药评价与分析 Vol. 16; no. 7; pp. 959 - 962
Main Author 赵敏 陈亚昆 孙瑞芳
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 民航总医院药剂科,北京,100123 2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN1672-2124
DOI10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2016.07.036

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:目的:系统评价阿卡波糖联合胰岛素治疗1型糖尿病的有效性和安全性。方法:计算机检索Pubmed、Cochrane Library、中国生物医学文献数据库、维普数据库及中国知网数据库,筛选阿卡波糖联合胰岛素治疗1型糖尿病随机对照试验,采用Rev Man 5.2软件对纳入文献进行荟萃(Meta)分析。结果:共纳入4个随机对照试验,Meta分析结果显示,阿卡波糖组与安慰剂组在降低糖化血红蛋白水平方面的差异无统计学意义(SMD=-0.45,95%CI=-0.98~0.01,P=0.06);2组患者胰岛素用量的差异有统计学意义(SMD=-0.34,95%CI=-0.52~-0.15,P=0.000 3);2组患者体质量的差异无统计学意义(SMD=-0.26,95%CI=-1.07~0.54,P=0.52);2组患者不良反应发生率的差异有统计学意义(OR=5.75,95%CI=3.56~9.27,P〈0.000 01),但低血糖发生次数的差异无统计学意义(SMD=0.28,95%CI=-2.45~3,P=0.84)。结论:基于所纳入的文献研究结果,阿卡波糖联合胰岛素治疗1型糖尿病是安全、有效的,能改善患者血糖水平,减少胰岛素用量,同时不增加体质量和发生低血糖,但对糖化血红蛋白无显著影响,阿卡波糖组患者腹泻、腹痛等胃肠道反应发生率更高。上述结论仍需开展大规模设计良好的随机对照研究和更长时间的随访来进一步验证。
Bibliography:Acarbose; Insulin; Type 1 diabetes; Meta-analysis
ZHAO Min, CHEN Yakun, SUN Ruifang(Dept. of Pharmacy, Civil Aviation General Hospital, Beijing 100123, China)
OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of acabose in treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Pubmed,Cochrane Library,China Biology Medicine,VIP and CNKI were retrieved,and the RCT of acarbose in treatment of type 1 diabetes were screened,Meta-analysis was conducted on the included literatures by using Rev Man 5. 2 software. RESULTS: Four RCTs were involved. According to the results of Meta- analysis,there was no statistical significance between acabose group and placebo group in reducing glycosylated hemoglobin levels( SMD =- 0. 45,95% CI =- 0. 98-0. 01,P = 0. 06),body weight( SMD =- 0. 26,95% CI =- 1. 07-0. 54,P = 0. 52),and the incidence of hypoglycemia( SMD = 0. 28,95% CI =- 2. 45-3,P = 0. 84). The difference was statistically significant in insulin administration( SMD =- 0. 34,95% CI =- 0. 52-- 0. 15,P = 0.
ISSN:1672-2124
DOI:10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2016.07.036