Valgus malalignment is a risk factor for lateral knee osteoarthritis incidence and progression: Findings from the multicenter osteoarthritis study and the osteoarthritis initiative

Objective To study the effect of valgus malalignment on knee osteoarthritis (OA) incidence and progression. Methods We measured the mechanical axis from long limb radiographs from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) and the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) to define limbs with valgus malalign...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inArthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) Vol. 65; no. 2; pp. 355 - 362
Main Authors Felson, David T., Niu, Jingbo, Gross, K. Douglas, Englund, Martin, Sharma, Leena, Cooke, T. Derek V., Guermazi, Ali, Roemer, Frank W., Segal, Neil, Goggins, Joyce M., Lewis, C. Elizabeth, Eaton, Charles, Nevitt, Michael C.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Hoboken Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company 01.02.2013
Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Objective To study the effect of valgus malalignment on knee osteoarthritis (OA) incidence and progression. Methods We measured the mechanical axis from long limb radiographs from the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study (MOST) and the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) to define limbs with valgus malalignment (mechanical axis of ≥1.1° valgus) and examined the effect of valgus alignment versus neutral alignment (neither varus nor valgus) on OA structural outcomes. Posteroanterior radiographs and knee magnetic resonance (MR) images were obtained at the time of the long limb radiograph and at followup examinations. Lateral progression was defined as an increase in joint space narrowing (on a semiquantitative scale) in knees with OA, and incidence was defined as new lateral narrowing in knees without radiographic OA. We defined lateral cartilage damage and progressive meniscal damage as increases in cartilage or meniscus scores at followup on the Whole‐Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score scale (for the MOST) or the Boston Leeds Osteoarthritis Knee Score scale (for the OAI). We used logistic regression with adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, and Kellgren/Lawrence grade, as well as generalized estimating equations, to evaluate the effect of valgus alignment versus neutral alignment on disease outcomes. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Results We studied 5,053 knees (881 valgus) of subjects in the MOST cohort and 5,953 knees (1,358 valgus) of subjects in the OAI cohort. In both studies, all strata of valgus malalignment, including 1.1° to 3° valgus, were associated with an increased risk of lateral disease progression. In knees without radiographic OA, valgus alignment >3° was associated with incidence (e.g., in the MOST, adjusted OR 2.5 [95% CI 1.0–5.9]). Valgus alignment >3° was also associated with cartilage damage on MR imaging in knees without OA (e.g., in the OAI, adjusted OR 5.9 [95% CI 1.1–30.3]).We found a strong relationship of valgus malalignment with progressive lateral meniscal damage. Conclusion Valgus malalignment increases the risk of knee OA radiographic progression and incidence as well as the risk of lateral cartilage damage. It may cause these effects, in part, by increasing the risk of meniscal damage.
Bibliography:Dr. Guermazi has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from AstraZeneca and Genzyme (less than $10,000 each) and from Stryker (more than $10,000), and he owns stock or stock options in, and is president of, Boston Imaging Core Lab (BICL), LLC.
Dr. Cooke owns stock or stock options in OAISYS, Inc. and holds patents for image analysis technology.
Dr. Roemer has received consulting fees, speaking fees, and/or honoraria from Merck Serono (less than $10,000) and owns stock in, and serves as vice president of, BICL, LLC.
ObjectType-Article-1
SourceType-Scholarly Journals-1
ObjectType-Feature-2
content type line 14
content type line 23
ObjectType-Article-2
ObjectType-Feature-1
ISSN:0004-3591
2326-5191
1529-0131
1529-0131
2326-5205
DOI:10.1002/art.37726