透明质酸钠膝关节腔内注射治疗骨关节病的疗效观察及护理

目的：探讨透明质酸钠膝关节腔内注射治疗骨关节的疗效及护理措施。方法：选取十堰市郧阳区中医医院2011年4月—2014年5月收治的138例骨关节病患者,按随机数字表法分为2组各69例;对2组患者均给予全方位的护理,观察组患者在此基础上联合透明质酸钠膝关节腔内注射,对照组患者在此基础上联合对症、支持治疗,疗程结束后,对2组患者的疗效和不良反应发生情况进行比较。结果：观察组患者总有效率为89.86%（62/69）,对照组为76.81%（53/69）,2组的差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;观察组患者不良反应发生率为8.70%（6/69）;对照组为20.29%（13/69）,2组的差异有统计学意义（P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in中国医院用药评价与分析 Vol. 16; no. 4; pp. 446 - 448
Main Author 王荣
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 十堰市郧阳区中医医院风湿科,湖北十堰,442599 2016
Subjects
全面性护理
关节腔内注射
透明质酸钠
骨关节病
全面性护理
骨关节病
Omnibearing nursing
Intra-articular injection
关节腔内注射
透明质酸钠
Sodium hyaluronate
Osteoarthritis
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:目的：探讨透明质酸钠膝关节腔内注射治疗骨关节的疗效及护理措施。方法：选取十堰市郧阳区中医医院2011年4月—2014年5月收治的138例骨关节病患者,按随机数字表法分为2组各69例;对2组患者均给予全方位的护理,观察组患者在此基础上联合透明质酸钠膝关节腔内注射,对照组患者在此基础上联合对症、支持治疗,疗程结束后,对2组患者的疗效和不良反应发生情况进行比较。结果：观察组患者总有效率为89.86%（62/69）,对照组为76.81%（53/69）,2组的差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;观察组患者不良反应发生率为8.70%（6/69）;对照组为20.29%（13/69）,2组的差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：透明质酸钠膝关节腔内注射治疗骨关节病的临床效果显著,可有效改善患者的临床症状,提高患者的生活质量,值得临床推广。
Bibliography:WANG Rong;Dept.of Rheumatology,Shiyan Yunyang District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine; Hubei Shiyan 442599, China
Sodium hyaluronate; Intra-articular injection; Osteoarthritis; Omnibearing nursing
OBJECTIVE：To probe into the efficacy and nursing measures of intra-articular sodium hyaluronate injection in treatment of osteoarthritis.METHODS：138 patients with osteoarthritis admitted into Shiyan Yunyang District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from Apr.2011 to May 2014 were selected to be divided into two groups via the random number table,with 69 cases in each.Two group of patients were given omnibearing nursing.Based on omnibearing nursing,the observation group were treated with intra-articular sodium hyaluronate injection,while the control group received symptomatic supportive treatment.After treatment,the efficacy and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between two group of patients.RESULTS：Observation group total effective rate was 89.86%（62 /69）and the control group was 76.81%（53
ISSN:1672-2124
DOI:10.14009/j.issn.1672-2124.2016.04.006